1989
DOI: 10.1080/00497878.1989.9978785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to do meaningful work in Women's Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated above, my concern in this chapter is how higher education pedagogy is being negatively affected by such a profit-focused logics. Writing myself into the traditions of critical, feminist and now also posthumanist and new materialist pedagogy (see Freire, 2001Freire, , 2006Giroux, 1988Giroux, , 2014; see Aptheker, 1989;hooks, 1994, 2003 (feminist pedagogy); and see van der Tuin, 2015;Snaza et al, 2016;Hickey-Moody and Page, 2016;Braidotti et al, 2018 (new materialist-inspired pedagogy)), it seems that higher education in the United States is less and less about making students understand their place as engaged citizens in today's world and that of the future. Leaving the issue of declining social mobility aside (Leatherby, 2016), the core problem seen from a more micro, classroom-based standpoint is that we, as teachers, are being confronted with a pedagogical praxis in which students are to be spoon-fed easily-digestible materials in short sessions, demarcated by neoliberal academic clock-time.…”
Section: American College Classroom Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated above, my concern in this chapter is how higher education pedagogy is being negatively affected by such a profit-focused logics. Writing myself into the traditions of critical, feminist and now also posthumanist and new materialist pedagogy (see Freire, 2001Freire, , 2006Giroux, 1988Giroux, , 2014; see Aptheker, 1989;hooks, 1994, 2003 (feminist pedagogy); and see van der Tuin, 2015;Snaza et al, 2016;Hickey-Moody and Page, 2016;Braidotti et al, 2018 (new materialist-inspired pedagogy)), it seems that higher education in the United States is less and less about making students understand their place as engaged citizens in today's world and that of the future. Leaving the issue of declining social mobility aside (Leatherby, 2016), the core problem seen from a more micro, classroom-based standpoint is that we, as teachers, are being confronted with a pedagogical praxis in which students are to be spoon-fed easily-digestible materials in short sessions, demarcated by neoliberal academic clock-time.…”
Section: American College Classroom Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%