How to estimate exposure when studying the temperature-mortality relationship? A case study of the Paris area

Abstract

Time series studies assessing the effect of temperature on mortality generally use temperatures measured by a single weather station. In the Paris region, there is a substantial measurement network, and a variety of exposure indicators created from multiple stations can be tested. The aim of this study is to test the influence of exposure indicators on the temperature-mortality relationship in the Paris region. The relationship between temperature and non-accidental mortality was assessed based on a time series analysis using Poisson regression and a generalised additive model. Twenty-five stations in Paris and its three neighbouring departments were used to create four exposure indicators. These indicators were (1) the temperature recorded by one reference station, (2) a simple average of the temperatures of all stations, (3) an average weighted on the departmental population and (4) a classification of the stations based on land use and an average weighted on the population in each class. The relative risks and the Akaike criteria were similar for all the exposure indicators. The estimated temperature-mortality relationship therefore did not appear to be significantly affected by the indicator used, regardless of study zone (departments or region) or age group. The increase in temperatures from the 90(th) to the 99(th) percentile of the temperature distribution led to a significant increase in mortality over 75 years (RR = 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07; 1.14]). Conversely, the decrease in temperature between the 10(th) and 1(st) percentile had a significant effect on the mortality under 75 years (RR = 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01; 1.06]). In the Paris area, there is no added value in taking multiple climatic stations into account when estimating exposure in time series studies. Methods to better represent the subtle temperature variations in densely populated areas in epidemiological studies are needed.

Temperature Observation Time and Type Influence Estimates of Heat-Related Mortality in Seven U.S. Cities

“…The siting of the meteorological stations used in this study may introduce some bias into the results, particularly because some of the stations are located in cities with a strong urban heat island effect (which impacts the diurnal temperature range) and/or one that has amplified over the study period (e.g., Chow et al 2012 ; Hondula et al 2012 ). We anticipate that any such bias would be small in light of other studies that have reported that temperature–mortality models using single meteorological stations perform just as well as those that incorporate multiple meteorological stations from different locations across urban areas ( Guo et al 2013 ; Schaeffer et al 2016 ). Additional research is required to understand how well airport observations correlate to actual temperatures experienced by urban residents (e.g., Bernhard et al 2015 ; Kuras et al 2015 ).…”

The short-term association between asthma hospitalisations, ambient temperature, other meteorological factors and air pollutants in Hong Kong: a time-series study

“…Therefore the data collected from the HKO site should accurately reflect meteorological conditions and their variations in Hong Kong. Furthermore, use of a single monitoring station for weather variables is standard for this sort of study done in urban areas,50 and a study on the use of multiple measuring stations in a densely populated European city50 found that there was ‘no added value in taking into account data from multiple weather stations when estimating exposure in the Paris area’. Another potential limitation is that our data included some non-emergency hospital admissions.…”

Comparison of temperature-mortality associations estimated with different exposure metrics

“…Several recent studies suggest that the magnitude of the temperature–mortality association is either similar 12 , 13 or larger 14 when assessed using spatially refined exposure estimates versus weather station measurements. However, these studies were conducted in relatively limited geographic areas, leaving open the question of whether their findings are specific to these locations or more broadly generalizable.…”