2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to: EUCAST recommendations on the screening procedure E.Def 10.1 for the detection of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates using four-well azole-containing agar plates

Abstract: Implications: This easy-to-use screening procedure for the detection of azole resistance in clinical A. fumigatus isolates will allow rapid testing in the daily routine of the microbiology laboratory and thus facilitate earlier appropriate therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Its performance is not affected by the observer's experience in mycology . The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing has released a standard method for performing azole‐containing agar plate tests . The YeastOne method was used for further testing of positive azole resistance screening isolates, to evaluate the MICs of several antifungals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its performance is not affected by the observer's experience in mycology . The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing has released a standard method for performing azole‐containing agar plate tests . The YeastOne method was used for further testing of positive azole resistance screening isolates, to evaluate the MICs of several antifungals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the only method recommended by the guidelines to detect azole resistance in patients suspected of having an infection caused by azole-resistant A. fumigatus is susceptibility testing by culture [6,8,38,39]. However, more than half of BAL cultures are reported with no fungal growth and IA diagnosis is made based on radiology, fungal biomarker and molecular test results which do not provide information on resistance [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Aspergillosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, even in the case of a positive culture and access to susceptibility testing or resistance screening, the turnaround times for these culture-based methods are long, and the delivery of results in clinically useful time frame is challenging. Particularly in smaller centres, where susceptibility testing is not available on site, this timeline often exceeds one week [39,44].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Aspergillosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrating tissue invasion by hyphae through microscopic examination of biopsy or autopsy material provides a diagnosis of proven invasive fungal infection. However, the sensitivity of microscopy for IA is 50% at best [14,35]. PCR approach can increase the sensitivity to 57-> 90% depending on the amount of fungi in the sample.…”
Section: Microbiological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%