How to Evaluate Green Development Policy Based on the PMC Index Model: Evidence from China

Ma, Xiangfei; Ruan, Yifan

doi:10.3390/ijerph20054249

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on these strengths, the model is clearly applicable to the energy supply policy evaluation conducted in this study. The model has also been widely used in policy evaluation, such as ecological compensation, 38,39 green development, 40,41 fire safety education 42 and fishery insurance. 43 In research on energy policy evaluation methods, most scholars apply qualitative methods; for instance, Lo 44 conducted a critical review of renewable energy and energy efficiency policies in the five areas of electricity, industry, transportation, buildings and local government in China and studied the progress and the limitations of China's formulation and implementation of these policies.…”

Section: Evolution Of Policy Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quantitative evaluation of China's energy supply policies in the ‘13th Five‐Year Plan’ period (2016–2020): A PMC index modelling approach incorporating text mining

Cheng,

Chen,

Lin

et al. 2024

Energy Science & Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Energy supply policy quality is an important factor that would impact national energy security. While existing research conducted policy evaluation from the lens of performance assessment, less study has been devoted to evaluating energy supply policy from the perspective of policy making. This study takes the energy supply policy documents issued by China's central government during the ‘13th Five‐Year Plan’ period (2016–2020) as the research sample, and pioneers the use of the extended policy modelling consistency (PMC) index model combined with the text mining methodology to construct a policy evaluation index system with the characteristics of the energy supply policy which conducts a more in‐depth quantitative evaluation of the energy supply policy documents. The results show that the average PMC index value of China's energy supply policies is 7.26, and the overall quality is high. The concerns of existing policies are mainly focused on reform and development planning, safety production management and project engineering construction, but there is still room for improvement in policy predictability, coordination of policy areas, clarity of policy basis and goals and comprehensiveness of policy tool combinations. Based on this, China should improve the comprehensiveness of its energy supply policy tool combinations in terms of policy design norm; strengthen policy predictability and coordination of policy areas in terms of policy implementation guarantee; and clarify the basis and goals of policies in terms of policy orientation enhancement, to provide a reference basis for the formulation and improvement of future energy supply policies and to realise the sustainable development of energy supply.

show abstract

Section: Evolution Of Policy Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantitative evaluation of China's energy supply policies in the ‘13th Five‐Year Plan’ period (2016–2020): A PMC index modelling approach incorporating text mining

Cheng,

Chen,

Lin

et al. 2024

Energy Science & Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since the policy disclosure (X 10 ) of the 12 policies is necessarily the same, the policy disclosure indicator variables are eliminated, and the matrix is constructed based on the scores of the remaining 9 first-level evaluation indicators to draw the PMC-CRITIC surface plot. According to the classification of policy evaluation grade in Table 4 and considering the representativeness of policy and the differences reflected in the policy issued by different subjects [ 43 ], three policies are selected from P8(the top-ranked excellent policy), P2 (the top-ranked acceptable policy), and P12(the undesirable policy), respectively, and presents the surface plots of these 3 policies, and conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the representative policies in each level, and proposes the corresponding optimization paths.…”

Section: Empirical Analysis Of Fiscal Policy Evaluation Under "Double...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of fiscal policy with text mining under "dual carbon" target in China

Zhang

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, there are three different types of policy assessment: pre-assessment, in-process assessment and post-assessment [16]. Many scholars used qualitative methods to conduct a post-evaluation of public policies, but few conducted a pre-evaluation and in-process evaluation of public policies.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating China’s Common Prosperity Policies against the Background of Green Development by Using the PMC Model

Ruan

Yang³

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green development is the background of common prosperity and is important for the sustainable development of China. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate China’s common prosperity policies to understand the advantages and disadvantages of common prosperity policies. In this paper, 15 representative common prosperity policies are research subjects, and this study uses the PMC (Policy Modeling Consistency) index method to assess the quality of common prosperity policies in China. This study, firstly, finds that the average value of the 15 common prosperity policies is 6.47, evaluated as a good grade. Secondly, 80% of policies are evaluated as a good or excellent grade, which means that the quality of the policy making of 80% of policies is at least good. Except for policy prescription, policy subject and policy incentive, the values of other first-level indicators are all greater than six, indicating that the Chinese government’s formulation level of common prosperity policies is relatively high. Thirdly, among fifteen common prosperity policies, one policy is evaluated as a perfect grade (quality of policy making is very good), four policies are evaluated as excellent (quality of policy making is better than required), eight policies are evaluated as good (quality of policy making is good) and two policies are evaluated as bad (quality of policy making is bad). Fourthly, by drawing figures composed of PMC curves, this paper analyzes common prosperity policies of different grades. Finally, some suggestions are proposed in this study to improve China’s common prosperity policies.

show abstract

How to Evaluate Green Development Policy Based on the PMC Index Model: Evidence from China

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Quantitative evaluation of China's energy supply policies in the ‘13th Five‐Year Plan’ period (2016–2020): A PMC index modelling approach incorporating text mining

Quantitative evaluation of China's energy supply policies in the ‘13th Five‐Year Plan’ period (2016–2020): A PMC index modelling approach incorporating text mining

Evaluation of fiscal policy with text mining under "dual carbon" target in China

Evaluating China’s Common Prosperity Policies against the Background of Green Development by Using the PMC Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About