Since its first demonstration, many comparisons have been made between 2D infrared (2D IR) and NMR spectroscopy (1, 2). Both techniques use a series of pulses to manipulate and measure free induction decays that resolve couplings and dynamics through their characteristic multidimensional plots. The timescales are very different, with 2D IR spectroscopy using femtosecond pulses to measure the picosecond coherence times of vibrational modes, whereas NMR spectroscopy uses microsecond or millisecond pulses to measure nuclear spins that can last seconds. Thus, the two spectroscopies provide vastly different perspectives on structural dynamics. The article by Yan et al. (3), published in PNAS, uses the fast time resolution of 2D IR spectroscopy to study the structural dynamics of a functionalized self-assembled monolayer, providing insights into structural motions that are intimately related to chemistry. However, their experiments are also demonstrating an aspect of the technique that is only now being recognized as exceptional: the sensitivity of the technique to incredibly small amounts of material.NMR spectroscopy is often said to be insensitive (4). Although the level of sensitivity depends on many factors, such as the type of nuclei being measured and the magnetic field strength of the spectrometer, the statement itself refers to the differences in population between the nuclear spin states that create the free induction decays, given by the Boltzman distribution. At room temperature, the energy difference between nuclear spin states is much smaller than kT, resulting in nearly equal populations of states. The difference in population between two 1 H proton states in an 11.7-Tesla magnetic field is about 1 in 10 5 (4). In comparison, the energy difference between the υ = 0 and υ = 1 vibrational states is about eight-times larger than kT, resulting in an enormous difference in population between the states. In other words, vibrational states have almost the entire population in the ground state.Signal strength, and hence the sensitivity, are related to population differences because free induction decays are generated by unequal numbers of transitions between eigenstates (5). An ensemble of molecules with statistically equally populated eigenstates will produce no signal because there are as many absorption as emission transitions. (In fact, a commonly used trick in NMR is to purposely equilibrate eigenstates to eliminate unwanted signals.) Thus, the ultimate sensitivity of 2D IR spectroscopy is inherently much higher than NMR spectroscopy, because nearly all of the molecules in the ensemble are available for excitation.
Dynamics of a Self-Assembled Film only One Molecule ThickIn their article, Yan et al. (3) demonstrate and use the sensitivity of 2D IR spectroscopy to measure a monolayer of molecules on a surface. The authors tethered a rhenium carbonyl vibrational probe to a monolayer of undecanethiol alkyl chains. Vibrational modes are sensitive to hydrogen bonding and electrostatics, and so the frequencies of...