2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to get the most out of costly Barrett’s oesophagus surveillance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the miss rate of this approach remains high, especially with subtle premalignant lesions in high-risk patients. The miss rate of dysplastic epithelium in Barrett's esophagus is reported to be 25% and miss rates as high as 28% are reported for (pre)malignant lesions in the lower GI tract in high-risk populations such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or Lynch syndrome [3][4][5][6][7]. In these patients, mucosal inflammation and metaplasia hamper the detection of small, flat, and subtle dysplastic lesions which tend to be malignant up to five times more often than the more common polypoid lesions [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the miss rate of this approach remains high, especially with subtle premalignant lesions in high-risk patients. The miss rate of dysplastic epithelium in Barrett's esophagus is reported to be 25% and miss rates as high as 28% are reported for (pre)malignant lesions in the lower GI tract in high-risk populations such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or Lynch syndrome [3][4][5][6][7]. In these patients, mucosal inflammation and metaplasia hamper the detection of small, flat, and subtle dysplastic lesions which tend to be malignant up to five times more often than the more common polypoid lesions [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%