How to govern the urban hydrosocial cycle: archaeo-genealogy of hydromentalities in the Swiss urban water sector between 1850 and 1950

Abstract

Abstract. Switzerland appears to be a privileged place to investigate the urban political ecology of tap water because of the specificities of its political culture and organization and the relative abundance of drinking water in the country. In this paper, we refer to a Foucauldian theorization of power that is increasingly employed in the social sciences, including in human geography and political ecology. We also implement a Foucauldian methodology. In particular, we propose an archaeo-genealogical analysis of discourse to apprehend the links between urban water and the forms of governmentality in Switzerland between 1850 and 1950. Results show that two forms of governmentality, namely biopower and neoliberal governmentality, were present in the water sector in the selected period. Nonetheless, they deviate from the models proposed by Foucault, as their periodization and the classification of the technologies of power related to them prove to be much more blurred than Foucault's work, mainly based on France, might have suggested.

Reifying “river”: Unpacking pluriversal possibilities in rejuvenation surrounding the Adi Ganga of Kolkata

“…2009), focusing on the power equations surrounding urban water dynamics and its immersion into the scalability of urban water governance (Swyngedouw, 2005(Swyngedouw, , 2009Gandy, 2008;McFarlane, 2008;Bakker, 2011;Rattu and Véron, 2015). Linton and Budds (2014) explained this further with the "hydrosocial" paradigm that had emerged out of political ecology of water, on "how water and society make and remake each other, over space and time, " harnessing on the hybridity between water and humans which is signified by the omission of the hyphen in "hydrosocial, " just as in a socionatural system where the two elements "socio" and "natural" cannot be separated or even distinguished (Wesselink et al, 2017).…”

A Social Exchange Analysis of Adaptive Governance in Water Allocation Processes, the Kafue Flats, Zambia

“…Hydromentality refers to the various mentalities, rationalities and techniques through which social actors' access, control and govern water use. As such, water infrastructure, discourse and institutions are conceived as hydromentalities through which water allocation is determined and enforced (Lankford, 2013;Rattu and Veron, 2015). The case study is centred on examining efforts aimed at establishing an equitable dam release regime that includes an environmental allocation for ecosystem maintenance.…”