2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1909.08660
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Hire Secretaries with Stochastic Departures

Thomas Kesselheim,
Alexandros Psomas,
Shai Vardi

Abstract: We study a generalization of the secretary problem, where decisions do not have to be made immediately upon candidates' arrivals. After arriving, each candidate stays in the system for some (random) amount of time and then leaves, whereupon the algorithm has to decide irrevocably whether to select this candidate or not. The goal is to maximize the probability of selecting the best candidate overall. We assume that the arrival and waiting times are drawn from known distributions.Our first main result is a chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this setting [HK15] examine a sliding window input model similar to ours, and find and analyze the optimal stopping rule as a function of window size. Additionally, [KPV19] study an even more general model where samples disappear after a random amount of time, and characterize optimal stopping rules in this setting. However, the differences between the prophet inequalities problem and the secretary problem make it difficult to apply techniques from these papers to our setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this setting [HK15] examine a sliding window input model similar to ours, and find and analyze the optimal stopping rule as a function of window size. Additionally, [KPV19] study an even more general model where samples disappear after a random amount of time, and characterize optimal stopping rules in this setting. However, the differences between the prophet inequalities problem and the secretary problem make it difficult to apply techniques from these papers to our setting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%