2020
DOI: 10.21037/asvide.2020.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to identify intersegmental planes in performing sublobar anatomical resections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniform, solid coagulation layer caused by sealing may also be unfavorable for recognization of the ISD. Compared with stapling, the inferiority of energy devices mainly include more complex procedures, increased risk of air leakage; 22–25 and dependence on clear and persistent ISD. Therefore, an appropriate combination is believed to be better than alone 9,11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform, solid coagulation layer caused by sealing may also be unfavorable for recognization of the ISD. Compared with stapling, the inferiority of energy devices mainly include more complex procedures, increased risk of air leakage; 22–25 and dependence on clear and persistent ISD. Therefore, an appropriate combination is believed to be better than alone 9,11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, during surgery, if the intersegmental plane is directly tailored by staplers after ligating the arterial and bronchi of the target segment, it may result in an insufficient surgical margin. [14][15][16] (5) Erroneous dissection of intersegmental veins and intersubsegmental veins can lead to postoperative pulmonary congestion or hemoptysis. 17 The analysis of image anatomy has revealed the consistent presence of venous drainage between segments and subsegments.…”
Section: Drainage Patterns Of Three Sub-branchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-tumors combined with a sponge and porcine lungs were utilized in this preclinical study based on the methods used in previous studies attempting percutaneous or transbronchial tumor localization using ICG (15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%