2018
DOI: 10.23996/fjhw.74143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to improve communication using technology in emergency medical services? A case study from Finland

Abstract: The field of emergency medical services (EMS) is a challenging environment for ensuring fluent information exchange between stakeholders because several different kinds of organizations are involved in EMS missions. Solutions for information and communication technology can vary significantly depending on the organization. This study aims to identify current communication bottlenecks between EMS professionals, understand the technological challenges behind them, and describe technologies that can improve EMS c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the systematic literature review and interviews with physicians showed that socioeconomic factors such as knowledge, system quality, information quality, service quality, training, organizational resources, teamwork, task-related stress, physical disposition, and noise influence the unsafe use of hospital information systems. Therefore, health information technologies (HIT) are recommended to reduce errors in HIS usability [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the systematic literature review and interviews with physicians showed that socioeconomic factors such as knowledge, system quality, information quality, service quality, training, organizational resources, teamwork, task-related stress, physical disposition, and noise influence the unsafe use of hospital information systems. Therefore, health information technologies (HIT) are recommended to reduce errors in HIS usability [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods and techniques for undertaking stakeholder analysis, such as standard stakeholder map, stakeholder triage, sociogram (Clayton, 2014; De Vita et al, 2016; Horita et al, 2019; Martikainen et al, 2015; Paletto et al, 2015), and multicriteria decision‐making techniques such as fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Ekmekcioğlu et al, 2021; Nilsson et al, 2016; Ozturkoglu & Turker, 2013). Proposed by Hwang and Yoon (1981), the TOPSIS is one of the most widely used Multi‐Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA) or Multi‐Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for solving real‐world decision problems (Behzadian et al, 2012; Tzeng & Huang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%