1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01246140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to increase the stability of external fixation units

Abstract: From general physical laws simple formulae have been deduced from which the rigidity of an external fixation unit mounted in different ways becomes mathematically calculable. Furthermore, the stability of various mounting systems under bending forces was investigated experimentally. Particular attention was paid to details of operating technique which are of special importance to the stability of the whole construction. The calculated data are consistent with the mechanical test results. The best arrangement o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the distance from the PBI to the connecting sidebar increases, the bending moment applied to the pin (hence, pin bending) increases, putting increased stress on the PBI (Pope and Evans 1982). Maximum rigidity of any system is achieved when the distance along the pin from the bone to the sidebar is minimised because stiffness of fixation pins is inversely proportional to the third power of their length (Brinker and Flo 1975;Egkher et al 1980;Egger 1983;Palmer et al 1993). T h e malleable tubing used for the MMA ESF can be contoured to the outline of the mandible before the MMA is introduced into the tubing, therefore the distance between the skin surface and MMA sidebar can be kept to a minimum for each individual fixator pin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the distance from the PBI to the connecting sidebar increases, the bending moment applied to the pin (hence, pin bending) increases, putting increased stress on the PBI (Pope and Evans 1982). Maximum rigidity of any system is achieved when the distance along the pin from the bone to the sidebar is minimised because stiffness of fixation pins is inversely proportional to the third power of their length (Brinker and Flo 1975;Egkher et al 1980;Egger 1983;Palmer et al 1993). T h e malleable tubing used for the MMA ESF can be contoured to the outline of the mandible before the MMA is introduced into the tubing, therefore the distance between the skin surface and MMA sidebar can be kept to a minimum for each individual fixator pin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis of most recent work has been in finding the stiffest configuration of particular fixators (Evans et al 1979, Egkher et al 1980 or in comparing different fixators to find the stiffest frame (Campbell & Kempson 1980, McCoy et al 1983. Despite careful theoretical analysis of the ideal fixator configuration, it may be impossible to apply this in the clinical situation because of the nature of the fracture or the soft tissue damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affliction of the hips by Charcot’s neuroarthopathy has been reported in isolated case reports or small series in etiologies ranging from diabetes mellitus,19 tabesdorsalis,20 chondrosarcoma of the cervical spine,10 congenital insensitivity to pain,11 intra-articular steroid use21 and even the use of epidural anesthesia in total joint arthroplasty 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%