1995
DOI: 10.4135/9781483348957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
561
2
63

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 771 publications
(637 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
561
2
63
Order By: Relevance
“…To study the influence of the activities on the evaluation of acoustic comfort, some questionnaire surveys were also conducted at the case site (Yu and Kang 2009). The questionnaire survey was conducted immediately after behaviour measurement, and every questionnaire survey was generally done by the interviewer in 3-5 minutes (Litwin 1995). In terms of subjective investigation, 1223 valid questionnaires were obtained at the survey site.…”
Section: Acoustic Comfort Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the influence of the activities on the evaluation of acoustic comfort, some questionnaire surveys were also conducted at the case site (Yu and Kang 2009). The questionnaire survey was conducted immediately after behaviour measurement, and every questionnaire survey was generally done by the interviewer in 3-5 minutes (Litwin 1995). In terms of subjective investigation, 1223 valid questionnaires were obtained at the survey site.…”
Section: Acoustic Comfort Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, not only must measurement be reliable but also free of systematic, uncontrolled bias that could be caused by a variable Z that is irrelevant by hypothesis. There are several types of validity (see again Litwin, 1995). Economists often distinguish between internal and external validity.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways to check for reliability (see e.g. Litwin, 1995): The test-retest method benefits from repeated measurement; in that case, eq. (1) applies directly.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument was pilot tested with 6-8 th students (n = 34) and revised (Shilts, Townsend, & Horowitz, 2002). Seventh and 8 th grade students (n = 46) completed the revised instrument on two occasions, three weeks apart, with no intervention (Litwin, 1995). Reliability coefficients were 0.73 for dietary behavior items, 0.55 for physical activity behavior items, 0.59 for dietary self-efficacy items and .48 for physical activity self-efficacy items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%