2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-010-0717-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to measure the urban‐wildland ecotone: redefining ‘peri‐urban’ areas

Abstract: The array of definitions regarding 'peri-urban' areas do not allow the precise measurement of its boundaries in a city. In this study, I developed an easyto-use method to calculate the area where urban and adjacent non-urban systems intermingle. To validate that such areas were ecologically meaningful, I compared bird community species-richness, abundance, and composition from 'intra-' and 'peri-urban' areas in a medium-sized neotropical city. Results show that 'periurban' areas represent an important ecologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that larger areas that are connected with the non-urban matrix can offer an important array of resources. Thus, by providing supplementary or complementary resources that may compensate for limited resource availability in greenspaces, they could allow the influx of individuals from the non-urban matrix, and enable the temporal establishment of populations of species of moderate sensibility to urbanization [64][65][66]. It is noteworthy to state that both Natura and Santuario have native ecosystem remnants and/or elements, which could be also driving our species richness results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that larger areas that are connected with the non-urban matrix can offer an important array of resources. Thus, by providing supplementary or complementary resources that may compensate for limited resource availability in greenspaces, they could allow the influx of individuals from the non-urban matrix, and enable the temporal establishment of populations of species of moderate sensibility to urbanization [64][65][66]. It is noteworthy to state that both Natura and Santuario have native ecosystem remnants and/or elements, which could be also driving our species richness results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This result could be given by the low species richness recorded in the studied greenspaces (average of about three to nine species per greenspace), which could be a result of the semi-permeable filtering of species from the non-urban matrix [9,65]. This was particularly true for copro-necrophagous beetles, amphibians, and bats, with contrastingly different assemblages in large peri-urban greenspaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We established a ~50% built cover threshold to differentiate between sites with low and high urbanization, i.e., 0-50% = low urbanization; 51-100% = high urbanization. To distinguish between intra-and peri-urban areas, we used methods to delineate the limit of the peri-urban area of an urban agglomeration (MacGregor-Fors 2010). Briefly, this method calculates the representative area in which the urban core intermingles with adjacent nonurban systems, representing an ecologically meaningful ecotone for birds (Puga-Caballero et al 2014).…”
Section: Focal Land Classes Within Urban-agricultural Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la última década se han generado, sobre México, estudios de ecología urbana que sustentan cambios en la composición, estructura y funcionamiento de la avifauna, los cuales son atribuidos a los humanos que modifican el hábitat de la avifauna (Ortega-Ál-varez y MacGregor- Fors 2009, MacGregor-Fors et al 2009, 2010, Chávez-Zichinelli et al 2010, Ortega-Álvarez y MacGregor-Fors 2011, Rodríguez-Ruíz et al 2011, Villegas-Patraca et al 2012, Malagamba-Rubio et al 2013, Chávez-Zichinelli et al 2013 Rodríguez-Ruiz et al…”
Section: Discussionunclassified