In this Editorial we would like to look at how the Emerald authors are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their work, if they adhere to the Emerald policies and principles on generative AI (GAI) usage, and also to provide some recommendations on how we as Editors should support our authors in legitimate uses of GAI to the benefit of academic research and scholarly communication.
Emerald policy on AI toolsEmerald policy on AI tools and authorship was made publicly available on Feb 22nd, 2023 (https://tinyurl.com/yc3t9djt).Emerald "Generative AI (GAI) usage key principles" are regularly updated and published on journals' websites as part of Author Guidelines. When submitting their manuscripts, authors must confirm that the manuscript has been created by the author(s) and not an AI tool/large language model (LLM).The research and publishing ethics section of the Emerald website (https://tinyurl.com/ 3xs5xwz4) underlines that (1) In case an AI tool/LLM has been used to develop or generate any portion of the manuscript, it is required "to be flagged in the Methods and Acknowledgements" sections of the manuscript;(2) The author(s) must describe the content created or modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI tool used;(3) Any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be appropriately cited and referenced;(4) Standard tools that are used to improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of this guidance;(5) The in-text reporting of statistics using a GAI tool/LLM is not permissible due to concerns over the authenticity, integrity and validity of the data produced, although the use of such a tool to aid in the analysis of the work would be permissible;(6) The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.
Other publishers' and journals' policiesRecent bibliometric analysis (Ganjavi et al., 2024) has revealed that by October 2023, among the top 100 largest publishers, 24% provided guidance on the use of GAI, while among the top 100 highly ranked journals, 87% provided such guidance. Of the publishers and journals with guidelines, the inclusion of GAI as an author was prohibited in 96 and 98%, respectively. Only one journal (1%) explicitly prohibited the use of GAI in the generation of a manuscript, and two (8%) publishers (including Emerald) indicated that their guidelines exclusively applied to the writing process. When disclosing the use of GAI, 75% of publishers and 43% of journals included specific disclosure criteria (Ganjavi et al., 2024).