2021
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11120977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Produce an Alternative Carbon Source for Denitrification by Treating and Drastically Reducing Biological Sewage Sludge

Abstract: Minimizing the biological sewage sludge (BSS) produced by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) represents an increasingly difficult challenge. With this goal, tests on a semi-full scale Thermophilic Alternate Membrane Biological Reactor (ThAlMBR) were carried out for 12 months. ThAlMBR was applied both on thickened (TBSS) and digested biological sewage sludge (DBSS) with alternating aeration conditions, and emerged: (i) high COD removal yields (up to 90%), (ii) a low specific sludge production (0.02–0.05 kgVS p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is also being carried out on the use of biological sewage sludge liquids (permeate) as a carbon source in the denitrification process, which are easily used by microorganisms due to their high biodegradability. This appears to be a good solution in terms of sustainable use, and effectively improves nitrogen removal efficiency, comparable to that obtained with methanol [17]. Fermentation byproducts can be a source of carbon, but this is not a feasible solution in every treatment plant, and, due to different fermentation conditions, hydrolysates are not the same [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Research is also being carried out on the use of biological sewage sludge liquids (permeate) as a carbon source in the denitrification process, which are easily used by microorganisms due to their high biodegradability. This appears to be a good solution in terms of sustainable use, and effectively improves nitrogen removal efficiency, comparable to that obtained with methanol [17]. Fermentation byproducts can be a source of carbon, but this is not a feasible solution in every treatment plant, and, due to different fermentation conditions, hydrolysates are not the same [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Collivignarelli et al [60] present results of an innovative biological process applied in sludge line. One of the points of their work was the possibility of recovering the acceptable carbon residue (supernatant) in denitrification processes, replacing bought external carbon sources.…”
Section: Advanced Biological Nitrogen Removal Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OUR and AUR tests, whose important applicability has been demonstrated in many previous studies [2,[25][26][27][28][29], were inevitably included in the protocol structure to study the impact of different substrates on the autotrophic and heterotrophic mesophilic biomass of the urban WWTP. In particular, the aim was to evaluate the effect of the ID on the biological activity of the CAS system.…”
Section: Our and Aur Tests (Step 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%