2018
DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to promote institutional reforms in the agricultural sector? A case study of Uganda's National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS)

Abstract: This study provides alternative explanations to the limited success of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program in Uganda, which was considered a role model for a demand-driven, decentralised and market-oriented agricultural extension reform in Africa. The analysis shows that the reform process was shaped by the interaction of two coalitions of actors: a donor-dominated coalition that pushed for a radical reform and advocated for the total overhaul of the existing structures and creating new… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proactive leadership, as seen in SHA and Hoima LG for instance, can make up for some of these weaknesses, while other constraints, for example the unfavourable policy environment, affected all equally. The agricultural sector in Uganda is fragmented and characterised by an unstable policy environment, lack of institutional stability and weak stewardship (Rwamigisa et al 2013). This fragmentation led to several constraints, making it difficult for the districts to institutionalise the plant clinics and for MAAIF and other key actors to coordinate actions effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactive leadership, as seen in SHA and Hoima LG for instance, can make up for some of these weaknesses, while other constraints, for example the unfavourable policy environment, affected all equally. The agricultural sector in Uganda is fragmented and characterised by an unstable policy environment, lack of institutional stability and weak stewardship (Rwamigisa et al 2013). This fragmentation led to several constraints, making it difficult for the districts to institutionalise the plant clinics and for MAAIF and other key actors to coordinate actions effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uganda's public agricultural extension system has undergone a raft of organisational and institutional changes over the last 50 years (Bashaasha, Mangheni, and Nkonya 2011;Rwamigisa et al 2013). Despite ambitious efforts to make extension services more inclusive and responsive to the needs of farming communities, the extension reforms have visibly not led to the expected results (Kibwika, Wals, and Nassuna-Musoke 2009;Bashaasha, Mangheni, and Nkonya 2011;AfranaaKwapong and Nkonya 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this decline as one looks at the challenges from the reforms since 1993; more specific policies to promote agricultural production including livestock largely failed while the National Agricultural Advisory Services success also remained contested since they were seen as being weak and expensive [21]. The National Agricultural Advisory Services Program from 2001 initially considered as a role model for demand-driven, decentralized and market-oriented agricultural extension reform in Africa despite adequate resources available had limited success [22]. It has thus been noted that; decentralization has not and will not necessarily lead to better outcomes due to the highly variable environment exampled by several decentralization and recentralization efforts made of the Forestry Department Uganda [23].…”
Section: Policy and Structural Reforms In The Delivery Of Veterinary mentioning
confidence: 99%