We have to thank Aziz et al 1 who, on behalf of the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics, published the 2020 neonatal resuscitation guidelines, which detail, on the basis of current evidence, procedures, and interventions, what must be performed during the newborn's first minutes of life, in particular during the first minute, to restore cardiorespiratory function. This timeframe is full of activities, including assessment of the newborn's muscular tone, breathing, and heart rate and if necessary oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram, and need of support with positive pressure ventilation. 1 Moreover, umbilical cord management must be decided at the same time. The 2020 guidelines report these recommendations: "For preterm and term infants who do not require resuscitation at birth, it is reasonable to delay cord clamping for longer than 30 s[econds]" 1(pS167) and "For term and preterm infants who require resuscitation at birth, there is insufficient evidence to recommend early cord clamping versus delayed cord clamping," 1(pS167) specifying that early cord clamping (ECC) means clamping within 30 seconds after birth. Thus, since most infants born very preterm need resuscitation, virtually none of them may have the potential beneficial effects of delayed cord clamping (DCC), although this strategy has been found to decrease mortality in infants born at 28 weeks' gestation or less. 2 Moreover, the guidelines report that umbilical cord milking (UCM) "is being studied as an alternative to delayed cord clamping but should be avoided in babies less than 28 weeks' gestational age, because it is associated with brain injury" 1(pS168) and concluded, therefore, that "for infants born at less than 28 w[ee]k[s] of gestation, cord milking is not recommended." 1(pS167) Thus, the strong message of these guidelines 1 is that UCM must be avoided in infants born very preterm, and most neonatologists will likely be prompted to stop milking cords and will continue to clamp them immediately in infants in more severe condition who require resuscitation.But what are the actual facts supporting this recommendation? Guidelines recommend avoiding UCM refer to a single randomized clinical trial by Katheria et al. 3 This study found that severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or more) was significantly more frequent (22% vs 6%) in infants born at 23 weeks and 0 days' gestation to 27 weeks and 6 days' gestation who had UCM, in comparison with those who had DCC. 3 However, this study did not include a control group assisted with the current standard of care, 3 namely ECC, and therefore what it actually demonstrates is that DCC is more effective than UCM in preventing severe intraventricular hemorrhage but not that UCM is less effective or more dangerous than ECC in infants born preterm and full term who need resuscitation at birth. On the other hand, it is noteworthy that the severe intraventricular hemorrhage rate of 22% in in-fantsassistedwithUCM 3 isnothigherthanexpected,since the Vermont Oxford Network reports...