This paper studies the development in the thought and praxis of Islamic
movements that aim to revive a political system governed by Islamic law.
Post-Caliphate Islamic movements - the subject of the current study - have
undergone recent reforms in thought, approach, and even branding since the
Arab Spring. Notwithstanding the movements? legal and theological diversity,
the author argues that they share common features of reform characterized by
(a) appeal to public opinion and grassroots work; and (b) willingness to
work with groups outside their movement. These reforms were shaped in tandem
with and in reaction to the War on Terror, the Arab Spring, and the
Taliban?s victory in Afghanistan. The author argues that these changes gave
rise to dynamic reform in the latest generation of Islamic movements,
leading to substantive revisions in their approach (manhaj) to achieving
Islamic change. Despite tightening proscription and censorship, the author
argues that the fruit of these reforms has been a resurgence in the form of
highly efficient and creative collaboration between movements. Examples
studied include collaboration between the Muslim Brothers (MB) and Hizb ut
Tahrir in the West, and between former-al-Qaeda and MB affiliates in Syria.
The author estimates these strategies - following a period of political
failure and internal skepticism - have precipitated a resurgence that makes
the future of Islamic movements highly potent, despite resulting in a
dilution of each group?s identity and possible decline in membership. As a
result of this trajectory, this study argues for the need to theorize
contemporary Islamic movements beyond historical categories that have
fossilized in Western academia, and often do not capture the dynamic,
fluidity and comprehensiveness of Islamic struggle. This study utilizes a
mixed methodology, including archival analysis and intellectual genealogy.