2020
DOI: 10.1177/1352458520943799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to reduce the delay of diagnosing secondary progression in multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the MS progression discussion tool). 63,64 The recommendations of a Canadian work group have also addressed this point discussing the described lack of consensus on definition of an adequate treatment response. 10 This group presented minor and major criteria for a therapy switch according to relapse rate, severity, recovery, as well as MRI criteria.…”
Section: Check the Strategy Continuously And Recognize The Opponents'...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the MS progression discussion tool). 63,64 The recommendations of a Canadian work group have also addressed this point discussing the described lack of consensus on definition of an adequate treatment response. 10 This group presented minor and major criteria for a therapy switch according to relapse rate, severity, recovery, as well as MRI criteria.…”
Section: Check the Strategy Continuously And Recognize The Opponents'...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time for transition from RRMS to SPMS (if it occurs) is highly variable [ 1 , 8 , 9 ], and a finite window of opportunity to identify subtle signs of progression and implement timely treatment adjustment is unique in every patient [ 26 ]. Rapid identification of MS disease progression is therefore key to facilitating treatment decisions and improving long-term prognosis [ 29 , 30 ]. Nonetheless, currently there is no consensus on the criteria to define disability progression, with various definitions being used in clinical trials [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, patients are retrospectively diagnosed with SPMS following a period of clear progression over 6–12 months, resulting in a diagnostic delay of up to 3–4 years [ 6 , 30 ]. This delay can lead to brain and spinal cord damage with clear clinical consequences, including irreversible physical and mental disabilities and a significant negative impact on quality of life (QoL) [ 27 , 29 ]. When considering how to successfully monitor patients and identify progression, the limitations of existing tools, the lack of useful biological markers, and the heterogeneity of the signs of progression place a high level of importance on clinical evaluation, which represents a considerable challenge for neurologists [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um eine mögliche SPMS-Konversion frühzeitig anamnetisch detektieren zu können [33], müssen jedoch Patient und Neurologe in der Lage sein, die frühen Hinwei-se und oft unklaren Anzeichen während der regulären Visite zu kommunizieren bzw. diese zu erfragen [34].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified