2004
DOI: 10.1108/03684920410514346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to restore Bertalanffian systems thinking

Abstract: Ludwig von Bertalanffy created general systems theory in an effort to counter the oversight and endangerment of humankind by disciplinary specialization. Bertalanffy desired for a holistic worldview and openness to replace overspecialization. Although widely cited and regarded, his concept prevailed only at a fictitious level, mostly as a tool inside specialization, which many scholars are neither able to overcome nor complement with interdisciplinary, creative co‐operation. Similarities (isomorphisms) are not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bertalanffy's most cited definition of system (95) is given in (96) According to Bertalanffy, systems theory is a "worldview of holism and attacks over-specialization; it is not one of many specialized disciplines of science; its methodologies and methods are supposed to support holism" (96), which means that systems theory uses holism to avoid reductionism on the assumption that the system does not have to equal the sum of its parts (96) (98) but rather that the 'whole is greater than the sum of its parts' -referred to as the system principle or holism (99) -or with a slightly different view said by Arbnor and Bjerke (40) "The whole is more (or is less) than the sum of its parts" along with "not only the parts but also their relations are essential, as the latter will lead to plus or minus effects (synergy)" (see Figure 7). The systems theory is supported by Mulej in (100) where he says that "humankind is in crisis due to lack of holism and due to too much reductionism", which is also shared by Mulej et al in (101) where they state that "holism is essential for humankind" and that there is a bigger chance of success in complex areas with a more holistic view. …”
Section: Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Bertalanffy's most cited definition of system (95) is given in (96) According to Bertalanffy, systems theory is a "worldview of holism and attacks over-specialization; it is not one of many specialized disciplines of science; its methodologies and methods are supposed to support holism" (96), which means that systems theory uses holism to avoid reductionism on the assumption that the system does not have to equal the sum of its parts (96) (98) but rather that the 'whole is greater than the sum of its parts' -referred to as the system principle or holism (99) -or with a slightly different view said by Arbnor and Bjerke (40) "The whole is more (or is less) than the sum of its parts" along with "not only the parts but also their relations are essential, as the latter will lead to plus or minus effects (synergy)" (see Figure 7). The systems theory is supported by Mulej in (100) where he says that "humankind is in crisis due to lack of holism and due to too much reductionism", which is also shared by Mulej et al in (101) where they state that "holism is essential for humankind" and that there is a bigger chance of success in complex areas with a more holistic view. …”
Section: Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…By summarizing and totaling the researchers in this article, the aims of general systems theory are (Bertalanffy, 1955;Skyttner, 1996;Boulding, 1964;Mulej et al, 2004): 1) There is a general tendency towards integration in the various sciences.…”
Section: General Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, each system is defined as a whole, and all systems have a feedback loop for selfcommunications (von Bertalanffy, 1968). The systemic approach to innovation identifies operational elements to determine the internal and external dependencies of innovation (Mulej et al, 2004;Stephens, 2013). Furthermore, adaptability to new technology needed a basic structure with an open-source technological approach to innovation (Allen & Geller, 2012).…”
Section: Foundation and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%