1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-56379-2_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to specify non determinism and true concurrency with algebraic term nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…give the same global effect as our transition (see [Bet92] for more detail). In reality, this replacement shows how ECATNets allow to specify a given situation at two levels of abstraction.…”
Section: Ic(pt) Is Of the Form [M]mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…give the same global effect as our transition (see [Bet92] for more detail). In reality, this replacement shows how ECATNets allow to specify a given situation at two levels of abstraction.…”
Section: Ic(pt) Is Of the Form [M]mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…It is worthwhile to mention that it is not easy to explain the behavior of ECATNets merely by giving the equivalent of a firing-like rule [Bet92]. This is because of their level of abstraction as well as their concurrent behavior.…”
Section: The Semanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(m2); For IC(p,t) n DT(p,t) # 0, we have shown in [2] that this case may be brought to the two previous cases.…”
Section: : Hidden Sorted Ecatnetsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They are given as follows [2]. For IC(p,t) =DT(p,t), we have: (p, IC(p,t)) + (q,CT(q,t)) (ml); For IC(p, t) n DT(p,t) = 0, we have:…”
Section: : Hidden Sorted Ecatnetsmentioning
confidence: 99%