2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to spend it: Resource wealth and the distribution of resource rents11The author would like to thank the The Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States at the London School of Economics, and two anonymous referees for comments on the paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, bottom-up education system strengthening can be enhanced through the allocation of part of the natural resource revenues to a conditional or labelled cash transfer programme for education, potentially with support from the extractives industry. This idea is in line with the concept of direct distribution of resource revenues that is currently at the forefront of the policy debate on combatting the resource curse (Giugale and Nguyen, 2014;Segal, 2012). Second, a substantial part of natural resource tax revenues could be earmarked for the top-down reinforcement of education supply.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, bottom-up education system strengthening can be enhanced through the allocation of part of the natural resource revenues to a conditional or labelled cash transfer programme for education, potentially with support from the extractives industry. This idea is in line with the concept of direct distribution of resource revenues that is currently at the forefront of the policy debate on combatting the resource curse (Giugale and Nguyen, 2014;Segal, 2012). Second, a substantial part of natural resource tax revenues could be earmarked for the top-down reinforcement of education supply.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…So far there exist surprisingly few studies that address the link betweennatural resources and government spending priorities. Segal (2012) however, argues that natural resource revenues differ from other government revenues, both in their time profile and political and legal status and Arezki et al (2011) in turn posit that "government spending is an important vehicle of the resource curse". In a study on US states Papyrakis and Gerlagh (2007) find that natural resource abundance decreases investments in human capital, measured as the contribution of educational services in GDP.…”
Section: The Natural Resource Curse: Revisiting the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These publicly owned natural resources are managed by governments on behalf of the public (Alberta Department of Energy, 2007;Otto, 2001;O'Faircheallaigh, 1999). Revenues generated from natural resource royalties and taxes can be used to benefit the public in many ways including developing public infrastructure, creating jobs, and decreasing taxes (Markey & Heisler, 2011;Segal, 2012). In some jurisdictions, such as Alaska, revenues are distributed directly to the public (Segal, 2012).…”
Section: Fiscal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept is now widespread that natural resources are a public welfare (Segal, 2012). Therefore, all citizens should receive benefits from the extraction of natural resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%