2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18819-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Support Group Decision Making in Horticulture: An Approach Based on the Combination of a Centralized Mathematical Model and a Group Decision Support System

Abstract: Open Archive Toulouse Archive OuverteOATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible To cite this version: ZaratéAbstract. Decision making for farms is a complex task. Farmers have to fix the price of their production but several parameters have to be taken into account: harvesting, seeds, ground, season etc… This task is even more difficult when a group of farmers must make the decision. Generally, optimization models … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one of the persisting challenges to take advantage of the full potential of the data is to achieve not only the integration of these technologies but also their interoperability. Diversity of stakeholders integrating agri-food supply chains with different interests and characteristics make difficult to find solutions that fit all those involved, so group decision-making tools should be developed [153]. Moreover, when these solutions require significant investments and there are stakeholders, such as small farmers with a limited budget.…”
Section: Technological Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, one of the persisting challenges to take advantage of the full potential of the data is to achieve not only the integration of these technologies but also their interoperability. Diversity of stakeholders integrating agri-food supply chains with different interests and characteristics make difficult to find solutions that fit all those involved, so group decision-making tools should be developed [153]. Moreover, when these solutions require significant investments and there are stakeholders, such as small farmers with a limited budget.…”
Section: Technological Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although at first glance it may seem that chain members may be unwilling to participate in this type of decision-making, more and more chains are establishing collaborative mechanisms among their members to enjoy the benefits of centralised decision-making. Examples of this type of mechanism are the signing of contracts in which retailers commit to buy all (or part of) the crop from farmers if they respect centrally defined planting areas for each vegetable (Federgruen, Lall & Şimşek, 2019), or the use of group decision support systems to select from a number of centralised solutions which of them will be finally implemented in the company (Zaraté, Alemany, del Pino, Esteso & Camilleri, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding technical challenges, Zaraté et al ( 2019) stated that it is necessary not only to integrate technologies but also to ensure their interoperability [105]. The diversity of interests and characteristics in the implementation and the heterogeneity of the sector make a single solution difficult.…”
Section: Rq4: What Are the Challenges Of Implementing Industry 40 In An Afsc?mentioning
confidence: 99%