2018
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042016-024408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Think About Social Identity

Abstract: What does it mean to identify with a social group? Are individuals’ group attachments tied to material or nonmaterial payoffs? What is the existing evidence for social identification due to nonmaterial payoffs? When do identities matter and for what sorts of behaviors? We highlight findings from several literatures in political science, ranging from voting and redistribution to violence and conflict, focusing on nonmaterial, identity-based motivations for behavior in these domains. Doing so allows us to draw o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our detached treatment of the ideational foundations of the AfD vote implicitly-and perhaps wrongly-assumes that these factors are relevant determinants of partisan preferences by themselves. Instead, they might be epiphenomena of more tangible considerations, such as material interests (Kalin and Sambanis 2018). Depending on the answers to this question, different implications follow for the present analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our detached treatment of the ideational foundations of the AfD vote implicitly-and perhaps wrongly-assumes that these factors are relevant determinants of partisan preferences by themselves. Instead, they might be epiphenomena of more tangible considerations, such as material interests (Kalin and Sambanis 2018). Depending on the answers to this question, different implications follow for the present analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, in the light of the other abovementioned approaches (i.e., Deschamps and Doise, 1979; Roccas and Brewer, 2002), other existing meta-theories in social identity literature may be also of interest in the study of identity-based emotions in sport. Particularly, the importance of considering the notion of group status and power asymmetries in applied contexts has become clear (Castel and Lacassagne, 2011; Kalin and Sambanis, 2018). Thus, for instance, beyond the self-esteem hypothesis associated with traditional social identity theories, Social partition theory (SPT; Castel and Lacassagne, 2011, 2015) showed that the ingroup, according to their identity interest, may be interpreted by its members as being hierarchically superior (or inferior) to another outgroup (i.e., statutory partition ), or as having better (or worse) values (i.e., oppositive partition ), or just as being the only one to exist as a majority group, leading to neglect of minority groups (i.e., community partition ).…”
Section: Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National identi cation is de ned as the personal signi cance that being part of a nation holds for an individual (Cameron, 2004;Leach et al, 2008;Postmes et al, 2012;Tajfel, 1978). Prior work has found that national identity plays an important role in motivating people to engage in costly behavior that bene ts other members of their national community (Kalin & Sambanis, 2018) and greater civic involvement (Huddy & Khatib, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%