2021
DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Treat High-Risk Myeloma at Diagnosis and Relapse

Abstract: Survival in multiple myeloma has improved greatly during the past 2 decades, but this change has primarily benefited patients who have standard-risk disease. Patients with high-risk disease remain a challenge to diagnose and treat. To improve their clinical outcomes, it is imperative to develop tools to readily identify them and to provide them with the most effective available treatments. The most widely used stratification system, the revised International Staging System, incorporates serum β-2 microglobulin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(192 reference statements)
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In 2015, the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) was introduced to develop a robust prognostic system on the basis of widely available biomarkers, and is now considered a standard risk stratification model for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). 2,3 The R-ISS takes into account ISS (which integrates b2microglobulin levels and serum albumin to reflect tumor mass and renal function), 4 high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [deletion(17p), translocation t(4;14)(p16;q32), or t(14;16)(q32;q23)], 5 and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. 6,7 The R-ISS identifies three groups: R-ISS I including ISS I without neither high-risk CA nor high LDH levels; R-ISS III including ISS III and either high-risk CA or high LDH levels; and R-ISS II including all the other possible combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In 2015, the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) was introduced to develop a robust prognostic system on the basis of widely available biomarkers, and is now considered a standard risk stratification model for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). 2,3 The R-ISS takes into account ISS (which integrates b2microglobulin levels and serum albumin to reflect tumor mass and renal function), 4 high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (CA) detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [deletion(17p), translocation t(4;14)(p16;q32), or t(14;16)(q32;q23)], 5 and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. 6,7 The R-ISS identifies three groups: R-ISS I including ISS I without neither high-risk CA nor high LDH levels; R-ISS III including ISS III and either high-risk CA or high LDH levels; and R-ISS II including all the other possible combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are many studies investigating the role of β2M in kidney diseases of different etiology. It has been demonstrated that β2M concentration is elevated among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus, beta thalassemia major, type 1 diabetes, acute appendicitis, and congenital lower urinary tract obstruction, among others [32][33][34][35][36]. In addition, β2M levels are used as a tumor marker, primarily in monitoring the treatment of multiple myeloma, a cancer that occurs typically in advanced age [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, research advances and the development of novel targeted therapies have contributed to markedly improved survival of patients with multiple myeloma. 1 However, the occurrence of relapse or disease progression is inevitable for most of these patients. 2 The clinical management of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in routine practice is a Association of IMWG frailty score with health-related quality of life profile of patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma in Italy and the UK: a GIMEMA, multicentre, cross-sectional study major challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%