2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.19.304667
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to use online tools to generate new hypotheses for mammary gland biology research: a case study forWnt7b

Abstract: An increasing number of ‘-omics’ datasets, generated by labs all across the world, are becoming available. They contain a wealth of data that are largely unexplored. Not every scientist, however, will have access to the required resources and expertise to analyze such data from scratch. Luckily, a growing number of investigators is dedicating their time and effort to the development of user friendly, online applications that allow researchers to use and investigate these datasets. Here, we will illustrate the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides the immense potential for scientists to boost their studies, as long as they have the skills and expertise to work with such databases. In their timely article, van de Grift and colleagues [ 20 ] share useful tips for mining large “omics” datasets using online tools. Using the example of the Wnt7b gene, the authors demonstrate how these tools can be used to generate new hypotheses and answer biological questions in silico.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides the immense potential for scientists to boost their studies, as long as they have the skills and expertise to work with such databases. In their timely article, van de Grift and colleagues [ 20 ] share useful tips for mining large “omics” datasets using online tools. Using the example of the Wnt7b gene, the authors demonstrate how these tools can be used to generate new hypotheses and answer biological questions in silico.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%