How traditional gender roles hurt both women and men: negative processes and outcomes in mixed-gender negotiations

Abstract

Purpose Based on the social role theory, role congruity theory and gender role conflict theory, this paper aims to investigate the mediating role of “relationship conflict” in the association between traditional gender role (TGR) endorsement and objective and subjective negotiation outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Two experimental negotiation studies (n1 = 138, n2 = 128) were conducted at a US university. Findings This paper presents three original and noteworthy findings: One, in mixed-gender negotiations, as a dyad’s TGR endorsement increases, final agreements become significantly more likely to favor men than women. Two, in mixed-gender negotiations, TGR endorsement is significantly associated with a decreased ability to establish a pleasant, mutually satisfactory and successful business relationship, resulting in a possible future economic cost due to lost opportunity. Three, the heightened relationship conflict during the negotiation mediates the negative association between TGR endorsement and women’s economic outcomes. Research limitations/implications Empirical findings support social role theory, role congruity theory and gender role conflict theory. The use of a distributive negotiation case and laboratory research methodology may limit the generalizability of findings. Practical implications Findings about the detrimental effects of TGR in mixed-gender negotiations magnify the importance of becoming aware of our TGR orientations and their potential negative consequences on our long-term collaborations. Also, it is necessary to provide negotiation trainings to both genders with regard to gender-driven conflicts and offer tools to prevent or tackle such conflicts. Social implications Negotiations are among the most consequential of social interactions as their results have a substantial impact on individuals’ careers and financial outcomes. Understanding the effect of TGRs is paramount to improve female representation, participation and effectiveness in management and leadership. Mixed-gender negotiations such as collective equality bargaining, workplace social interactions, work-life balance discourse are critical to establishing gender equality and fairness in organizations and societies. Originality/value Understanding how gender influences negotiation processes and outcomes and using the findings to improve both genders’ negotiation success are crucial to establishing fairness and equity in society and business. This research attempts to close a gap in the literature by focusing on the potential function of gender role orientation in explaining gender differences in negotiation.

Exploring the Journey and Perspectives of Women County Executives in Tennessee

“…These experiences explain why there are so few women in top-level leadership positions and are supported by others' research (Harmon & Walden, 2021). Researchers have also used social role theory to explain the implicit bias female leaders face, where women typically suffer stereotyped-based discrimination or prejudice against their leadership (Boussalis et al, 2021;Brueckner et al, 2021;Rua et al, 2021). When participants in the present study were asked what they enjoyed most in the position, the answers were similar.…”

“…The informal nature of face-to-face interviews permits a researcher to acquire an improved understanding of the participants' experiences, without associating predetermined constraints with the participant's responses (Bulus & Dong, 2021). Other scholars have explored women's leadership utilizing a qualitative process (Ladam et al, 2018;Maturo, Migliori, & Paolone, 2019, Rua et al, 2021Shill, 2022). The data collection process involved interviewing women leaders which was similar to the method for this study.…”

“…When a female manager gets promoted, for example, and finds herself in a setting dominated by men, it conveys the stereotypical message that women do not belong there and that she is an exception to the rule (Fisk & Oveton, 2019). When women transcend traditional gender lines Open Journal of Social Sciences and operate in agentic ways, they face backlash and animosity because they have broken a gender role that is designated for men (Boussalis et al, 2021;Hamori et al, 2022;Rua et al, 2021). Although men are supposed to demonstrate leadership or aggressive qualities, women are perceived as uppity when they exhibit the same behaviors (Krook, 2019;Ladam et al, 2018).…”

Women as leaders: the glass ceiling effect on women’s leadership success in public bureaucracies

“…The argument by Rua et al (2020) indicates that, traditionally, women are overloaded with numerous family responsibilities as a glass cliff to exercise their leadership skills. In glass ceiling theory, in a patriarchal society, a specific borderline exists for women, and if they attempt to cross that boundary, then people start defaming them.…”

Team psychological contracts: Effects of gender and social comparison orientation

“…Buunk et al (2020) found that women reported higher SCO than men, suggesting that women are more sensitive to stress and encounter more life stressors due to ongoing gender inequalities. Similarly, Rua and colleagues (2021) found that women who endorsed stereotypical gender roles realized worse economic outcomes in a negotiation, asserting that the pressure and anxiety of the negotiation caused many women to emphasize feminine behaviors deemed more socially acceptable. Although a slightly different context, teamwork involves negotiating roles and ways of working in the storming and norming stages of group development (Tuckman and Jensen, 1977).…”