2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It requires tutors to design and manage the assessment instruments used and monitor the process to address any problems students have with it. This web service can be an excellent technological tool to facilitate the impetus for change identified by Bearman et al (2017) The last objective that guided this study was to influence the practice of peer assessment to focus on areas of greatest potential for change and improvement. The results obtained in the IPMA analysis confirm the importance of evaluative judgement and feedback as the primary elements on which to act in order to significantly improve competence development.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires tutors to design and manage the assessment instruments used and monitor the process to address any problems students have with it. This web service can be an excellent technological tool to facilitate the impetus for change identified by Bearman et al (2017) The last objective that guided this study was to influence the practice of peer assessment to focus on areas of greatest potential for change and improvement. The results obtained in the IPMA analysis confirm the importance of evaluative judgement and feedback as the primary elements on which to act in order to significantly improve competence development.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cross-case comparison of education, law and English degrees at one Australian university illustrated a range of distinctive and overlapping features, distinguishing each discipline and assessment regime. Each case reflected the complexity of assessment design and interpretation in higher education (Bearman et al 2017), and highlighted that a consistent approach to categorising and communicating assessment components might enhance a variety of assessment processes. Analytical tasks were identified as the main rhetorical purpose for assessment in the three cases, making up the highest percentage of assessments in education (22%), law (30%) and English (42%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aligns with previously identified challenges of teaching Indigenous health (Jackson et al, Gair, 2016;McDermott & Sjoberg, 2012;Ranzijn et al, 2008;Ryder & Edmondson, 2015;Thackrah & Thompson, 2013;Virdun et al, 2013). In addition, even if individual teachers reflected deeply about transformative learning and sequenced their teaching and assessment tasks to scaffold student learning and they aligned their assessment tasks to closely align with and scaffold the learning goals, they may not have the time, the authority or the space within the curriculum to influence the dominant hegemony of a scientific based and biomedical learning focus (AIDA/MDANZ, 2012; Bearman et al, 2016;Brigg, 2016;Delany et al, 2016;Department of Health, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have focused on factors influencing academics' capacity to undertake this necessary design work. Bearman et al, (2016) found the task of designing assessment was influenced by academics' personal beliefs about teaching and goals of learning. They also found the affordances and barriers provided by higher education institutions, including the explicit and implicit value given to a subject area within a disciplinary program and the influence of regulatory requirements from accreditation and competency standards, impacted on the capacity of academics to design and implement assessment tasks (Bearman et al, 2016;Bearman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation