1997
DOI: 10.1097/00001504-199709000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How useful is the concept of quality of life in psychiatry?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
149
2
17

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
149
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest N consists of 440 parent-child pairs for CSHCN with mental health problems, 271 pairs for CSHCN with physical health problems and 670 pairs for controls. ICCs represent poor to fair (equal or lower than 0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), good (0.61-0.80), and excellent agreement (0.81-1.00) [30] higher, because they do not want to admit how much their health condition affects them [7,21,33], because they are not fully aware of restrictions due to this condition [7,19,33] or because they have adapted to their situation [21,34]. However, that higher self-ratings also were identified among healthy controls contradicts the pattern proposed by Upton et al (self-rating \ parent rating) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest N consists of 440 parent-child pairs for CSHCN with mental health problems, 271 pairs for CSHCN with physical health problems and 670 pairs for controls. ICCs represent poor to fair (equal or lower than 0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), good (0.61-0.80), and excellent agreement (0.81-1.00) [30] higher, because they do not want to admit how much their health condition affects them [7,21,33], because they are not fully aware of restrictions due to this condition [7,19,33] or because they have adapted to their situation [21,34]. However, that higher self-ratings also were identified among healthy controls contradicts the pattern proposed by Upton et al (self-rating \ parent rating) [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao se falar em qualidade de vida, devem-se considerar aspectos de bem-estar psicológico e social, condição de saúde, funcionamento emocional, desempenho funcional, satisfação com a vida, padrão de vida e suporte social 3 . Desta forma, devido à influência de múltiplos fatores na qualidade de vida, esta se constitui em um tema de grande relevância e pródigo para o trabalho interdisciplinar na escola.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A person's quality of life should not only be defined by a person's subjective sense of well-being, but also by the ability to function in various life domains, and by the possibility to access resources and opportunities (Katschnig, 1997;Lehman, 1997). While subjective wellbeing and happiness might seem to be the ultimate goal all people are striving for, functioning in social roles and access to resources and opportunities are the prerequisite for the possibility that such well-being and happiness can also be present in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three types of symptoms, which can distort subjective quality of life assessments: affective, cognitive and reality distortion symptoms, such as delusions and hallucinations. The respective distortions of quality of life measures, have been called the affective, the cognitive and the reality distortion fallacy (Katschnig, 1997).…”
Section: Occasional Difficultiesjn Adequa-tely Perceiving and Communimentioning
confidence: 99%