2005
DOI: 10.1353/tech.2006.0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while the epistemic nature of future research was often underdetermined, all types of collections were informed by the imagined social ties that would be created through curating and using samples/data. As in other technological realizations (Oudshoorn and Pinch, 2003), biomedical professionals' relationships to 'their' biobank collections were mediated by imaginations about future users. Visions of who the work and effort of assembling resources would be done for and how future users would relate to the collectives of curators sustained the data/sample labour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the epistemic nature of future research was often underdetermined, all types of collections were informed by the imagined social ties that would be created through curating and using samples/data. As in other technological realizations (Oudshoorn and Pinch, 2003), biomedical professionals' relationships to 'their' biobank collections were mediated by imaginations about future users. Visions of who the work and effort of assembling resources would be done for and how future users would relate to the collectives of curators sustained the data/sample labour.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholars have demonstrated the intersections between science, technology, and society by highlighting how techno-scientific developments are embedded within socio-historical and technical contexts (Bijker & Law, 1994;Bloor, 1991;Haraway, 1991;Latour, 1987;Latour & Woolgar, 1986;Law, 1991). STS and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research, particularly the literature of Postcolonial HCI, HCI4D, and Indigenous HCI, has emphasized the need to capture socio-cultural and political dimensions of technologies to highlight complexities in situated cultural contexts (Abdelnour-Nocera, Clemmensen, & Kurosu, 2013;Ali, 2014;Hardy, Wyche, & Veinot, 2019;Irani, Vertesi, Dourish, Philip, & Grinter, 2010;Oudshoorn & Pinch, 2005;Wyatt, 2005). Abdelnour-Nocera et al ( 2013) acknowledge that "the idea of what constitutes a useful and usable system in different cultural contexts remains partially explored at the very least" (p. 201).…”
Section: Discussion/implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because technological evolution is an open-ended process, wherein various social groups have the opportunity to influence the design and functionality of technology to better meet societal needs. Oudshoorn and Pinch (2005) further elaborate on the evolution of technology by focusing on the user dimension, highlighting how users not only shape technology but are also shaped by it in return. This concept is pivotal as it illustrates that the advent of specific technologies establishes new norms and cultures within social interactions.…”
Section: Social Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%