2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How we relate to brands: Psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer–brand relationships

Abstract: In three experiments, this research provides new insights into branding by studying the psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms of how consumers relate to their beloved brands. The authors propose that emotional arousal decreases over the brand relationship span, while inclusion of the brand into the self increases over time. Results of experiment 1 indicate greater self-reported emotional arousal for recently formed brand relationships, as well as decreased emotional arousal and increased inclusion of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
171
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
7
171
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When employing autonomic physiologic measurements, studies are often carried out under strictly controlled laboratory conditions rather than in the shop (Lohse, 1997;Pieters et al, 1999;Van der Lans et al, 2008;Milosavljevic et al, 2011;Reimann et al, 2011). This is because extraneous stimuli such as those present in a shopping environment may influence the internal validity of results.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When employing autonomic physiologic measurements, studies are often carried out under strictly controlled laboratory conditions rather than in the shop (Lohse, 1997;Pieters et al, 1999;Van der Lans et al, 2008;Milosavljevic et al, 2011;Reimann et al, 2011). This is because extraneous stimuli such as those present in a shopping environment may influence the internal validity of results.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers posit that brands that have been associated with rewarding or appetitive stimuli due to marketing, engage similar brain reward-related networks (24). In support, neuroimaging studies reveal that presentation of preferred versus non-preferred brands recruited striatal, occipital, and vmPFC activity (25,26) and exposure to familiar versus non-familiar brands resulted in precuneus and occipital cortex activity (27,28). Similarly, among healthy-weight youth, exposure to branded food logos versus non-food logos, elicited response in the posterior cingulate and occipital cortices, regions implicated in stimulus saliency, visual processing, and attention (29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Brodie et al (2006) highlight the role of brands as facilitators of relationships and propose that brands are relational assets in a complex network of relationships. Thus, brands develop bonds with their customers that bring the brand seller and buyer together (Coviello et al, 2002;Veloutsou and Moutinho, 2009;Reimann et al, 2012;Albert and Merunka, 2013). However, brands do not only establish relationships with their customers, but also with many other stakeholders as its suppliers, investors or the community.…”
Section: Consumer-brand Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%