2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.00080.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Welfare Policies Affect Adolescents' School Outcomes: A Synthesis of Evidence From Experimental Studies

Abstract: Using data from 8 random assignment studies and employing meta-analytic techniques, this article provides systematic evidence that welfare and work policies targeted at low-income parents have small adverse effects on some school outcomes among adolescents ages 12 to 18 years at follow-up. These adverse effects were observed mostly for school performance outcomes and occurred in programs that required mothers to work or participate in employment-related activities and those that encouraged mothers to work volu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Syntheses based on three pre-PRWORA welfare reform experiments 5 ("waivers"), some of which included features such as work requirements and time limits that later were included in the PRWORA legislation (see Data section) did not find consistent evidence that work incentives had a significant impact on adolescents having trouble with the police or being suspended or expelled from school (Gennetian et al 2002(Gennetian et al , 2004. Grogger and Karoly (2005), reviewing a broader set of waiver programs, concluded that there may have been adverse effects of welfare reform on outcomes generally for youths age 10 years and over.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Effects Of Welfare or Employment On Teementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntheses based on three pre-PRWORA welfare reform experiments 5 ("waivers"), some of which included features such as work requirements and time limits that later were included in the PRWORA legislation (see Data section) did not find consistent evidence that work incentives had a significant impact on adolescents having trouble with the police or being suspended or expelled from school (Gennetian et al 2002(Gennetian et al , 2004. Grogger and Karoly (2005), reviewing a broader set of waiver programs, concluded that there may have been adverse effects of welfare reform on outcomes generally for youths age 10 years and over.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Effects Of Welfare or Employment On Teementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant scholarship suggests that parents' experiences in employment, such as the stimulation and supportiveness of the work environment , the stability of work schedules (Han, 2005;Presser, 2003), or the strain resulting from balancing work and family roles (Morris & Coley, 2004) may influence parenting practices and the home environment. Related research also notes that parents' use of additional services, such as child care and afterschool programs, may serve as an important conduit through which welfare reform and maternal employment experiences influence children (Gennetian et al, 2004;Huston et al, 2005). Finally, psychological models of family stress (Conger et al, 1992;McLoyd, 1998) suggest that the link between economic resources and children's development is mediated through complex systems of interrelated family processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current welfare system, Cambodian youth's "carrying capacity" exceeds their ability to balance family, work, and school obligations (Burnham, 2001). A strong sense of parental and sibling obligation may be misinterpreted as a cultural deficit (Gennetian, Duncan, Knox, et al, 2004, but this is because the actions of youth are viewed outside the logic and meaning of family survival strategies that have been threatened by policies that disadvantage poor youth. The loss of public assistance to their families contributes to their decision to take low wage jobs rather than toward educational opportunities, which would increase their social mobility but would not address the immediate needs of their family members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth programs should recognize that despite intergenerational conflicts, parents and children often work together to ensure economic security. Parental and sibling obligation can lead to a sense of responsibility and inspire achievement; however these relationships have been portrayed as a potential detriment to individual achievement (Gennetian, Duncan, Knox, et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%