2003
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.38.6.1122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Well Do Critical Nitrogen Concentrations Work for Cabbage, Carrot, and Onion Crops?

Abstract: With the introduction of nutrient management legislation in Ontario, there is a need to improve the efficiency of nitrogen (N) utilization. One possibility is to use critical nutrient concentrations in plant tissue as an indicator of the N nutritional status of the crop. Plant tissue analysis was used to determine the total N and nitrate-N (NO3-N) concentrations of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of significant correlation is consistent with the results of Westerveld et al (2003b). Further, consistent with the findings of Westerveld et al McKeown 2006, 2007a;Westerveld, McKeown, and McDonald 2006a) and White and Strandberg (1978), plants took up more N than was estimated to be available in the top 30 cm of soil when applied at the rates of 45 and 90 kg ha −1 .…”
Section: Soil N Availability and Plant Uptakesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lack of significant correlation is consistent with the results of Westerveld et al (2003b). Further, consistent with the findings of Westerveld et al McKeown 2006, 2007a;Westerveld, McKeown, and McDonald 2006a) and White and Strandberg (1978), plants took up more N than was estimated to be available in the top 30 cm of soil when applied at the rates of 45 and 90 kg ha −1 .…”
Section: Soil N Availability and Plant Uptakesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with earlier studies of Hemphill and Jackson (1982), Sanderson and Ivany (1997), Warncke (1996), Westerveld et al (2003aWesterveld et al ( , 2003b, McKeown (2006, 2007a), andMcDonald (2006a, 2006b), carrot yield did not significantly respond to increasing N rate (Table 5). Available N between 153 to 189 kg ha −1 (treatment 3 in most of the studies) produced the greatest numerical yield although it did not statistically differ, regardless of site conditions or protocol.…”
Section: Downloaded By [Duke Universitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Some have indicated that N fertilizer has little effect on bulb yield (Hensel and Shumaker, 1992;Shock, 2005;Westerveld et al, 2003). The small responses to N were due to annual overapplication (Westerveld et al, 2003), nitrogen fertilization practices based on crop nutrient uptake (Shock, 2005), inaccuracy of soil test recommendations (Russo, 2008), initial residual soil nitrate and ammonium, nitrate in the irrigation water, and mineralized N during the onion growing season (Shock et al, 2004). Marketable yield at 0 kg·ha −1 of N-P-K was 40.8 Mt·ha −1 , which was 70% of the yield achieved at the recommended 241 rate (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that wilting of leaves caused increased NO 3 -N concentrations because of a concentrating effect. Another possibility is that critical NO 3 -N concentrations are highly dependent on the growth stage of the carrot (Westerveld et al 2003b). Sap NO 3 -N concentrations clearly decline over the growing season, especially during the early and midseason sampling stages.…”
Section: Carrot Critical Sap and Soil Nitrate Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this estimate was based on a 1-year study, and potential variations among years, soil types, or cultivars were not examined. In addition, critical tissue NO 3 -N concentrations determined in other regions are not useful for N management of carrots, onions, and cabbage in Ontario because of variations in climate, soil, and cultivar (Westerveld et al 2003b). The usefulness of sap NO 3 -N tests is reduced in certain instances because of variability in sap NO 3 -N concentrations caused by aging of sample material (sweet corn), differences among sites (sugarbeets), differences among cultivars (tomato), and large decreases in concentrations over the season (potato) (Coltman 1988;Hartz et al 1993;Geypens and Vandendriessche 1996;Last and Tinker 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%