2012
DOI: 10.1002/hec.2837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Well Do Diagnosis‐related Groups Explain Variations in Costs or Length of Stay Among Patients and Across Hospitals? Methods for Analysing Routine Patient Data

Abstract: We set out an analytical strategy to examine variations in resource use, whether cost or length of stay, of patients hospitalised with different conditions. The methods are designed to evaluate (i) how well diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) capture variation in resource use relative to other patient characteristics and (ii) what influence the hospital has on their resource use. In a first step, we examine the influence of variables that describe each individual patient, including the DRG to which the patients ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the skewness and make the assumption of normality underlying the linear regression model more tenable, we transformed LOS using the logarithmic transformation; an approach frequently used in the analysis of cost and LOS data. 64 Some patients were admitted and discharged within the same day, that is, had a recorded LOS of no days. For these observations the logarithm of LOS would not be defined and the observation would thus be excluded from the analysis even though they still consumed hospital resources.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the skewness and make the assumption of normality underlying the linear regression model more tenable, we transformed LOS using the logarithmic transformation; an approach frequently used in the analysis of cost and LOS data. 64 Some patients were admitted and discharged within the same day, that is, had a recorded LOS of no days. For these observations the logarithm of LOS would not be defined and the observation would thus be excluded from the analysis even though they still consumed hospital resources.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is an extensive literature on payment systems in healthcare, including literature examining the adequacy of HRG methods,23 and the choice of funding algorithms,24 this has seldom been applied to paediatric critical care 16. Indeed, paediatric HDC has generated only a limited academic literature, with acknowledgement that this area requires further study 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The country effect could be interpreted as the unobserved supply-side differences between countries, such as the quality of local hospitals. We assume that the country effect r j is fixed (Street et al, 2012. After the OLS estimation of the fixed parameters, the predicted mean costs are given bŷ Mihaylova et al (2011) systematically review papers that are not only applicable to randomized trial data, but also relevant for studies that use administrative register data, such as with EuroHOPE.…”
Section: Appendix B: Details On the Empirical Specification Of The Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EuroDRG project (Street et al, 2012;Häkkinen et al, 2012), the treatment costs of a single admission (possible transfers between hospitals are not accounted for) for several diseases are compared and estimated. The analysis is based on patient-level costs, and when cost data are absent, variation in hospital length of stay is examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%