2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How well do satellite AOD observations represent the spatial and temporal variability of PM 2.5 concentration for the United States?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows that some years are associated with favourable conditions for spaceborne retrievals of aerosol mass. While our single AOT-to-PM2.5 relationship gives reasonable results for most of the present cases, it is unclear how much of the uncertainties can be explained by differences in aerosol type (mass-scattering efficiency), aerosol heterogeneity, humidity and presence of clouds Á all of which might vary from case to case (Li et al, 2015). Hence, dedicated campaigns (Crumeyrolle et al, 2014) and measurement networks (Snider et al, 2015) are necessary to further explore the potential of using satellite remote sensing for spaceborne monitoring of aerosol mass and particleloading-related air quality.…”
Section: General Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 5 shows that some years are associated with favourable conditions for spaceborne retrievals of aerosol mass. While our single AOT-to-PM2.5 relationship gives reasonable results for most of the present cases, it is unclear how much of the uncertainties can be explained by differences in aerosol type (mass-scattering efficiency), aerosol heterogeneity, humidity and presence of clouds Á all of which might vary from case to case (Li et al, 2015). Hence, dedicated campaigns (Crumeyrolle et al, 2014) and measurement networks (Snider et al, 2015) are necessary to further explore the potential of using satellite remote sensing for spaceborne monitoring of aerosol mass and particleloading-related air quality.…”
Section: General Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These three quantities can be treated identically, using their local probability distributions to define extreme events; however, the ASI, being Boolean, cannot define extremes in terms of severity. PM 2.5 extremes can occur in both summer and winter in ENA (38), but because the vast majority of temperature and O 3 extremes occur between late spring and early fall, our statistics consider only days during the extended summer season (April 1-September 30). We adopt the ∼95th percentile (see below) as the local extreme threshold, because that is equivalent to our 100-d per decade definition if all extremes occur during this extended summer period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular economic region suffers frequently from haze episodes, especially in the winter heating period, due to coal burning in heating stations and power plants. variability comparison between satellite-derived AOD and PM2.5, Li et al [36] found diverse, even opposite, seasonal cycles in the PM2.5-AOD relationship owing to the varied height of the atmospheric mixing layer. Such studies highlighted the importance of spatio-temporal variability in PM2.5-AOD relations, but failed to explicitly and simultaneously incorporate variable factors into models to infer ground-level PM2.5 concentrations from satellite AOD estimations.…”
Section: Study Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of pollutant concentrations including ground-level PM 2.5 is therefore performed regularly in many industrialized countries that have established air quality monitoring stations a short distance from residential or manufacturing districts [6][7][8][9]. Traditional air quality estimations from ground-based stationary ambient variability comparison between satellite-derived AOD and PM 2.5 , Li et al [36] found diverse, even opposite, seasonal cycles in the PM 2.5 -AOD relationship owing to the varied height of the atmospheric mixing layer. Such studies highlighted the importance of spatio-temporal variability in PM 2.5 -AOD relations, but failed to explicitly and simultaneously incorporate variable factors into models to infer ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations from satellite AOD estimations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%