2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00363-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
255
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
255
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional limitation is that survey responses may not reflect actual decision-making in clinical practice. Although survey-based clinical vignettes are widely recognized to be a valid, reliable, practical, and cost-effective technique to assess process of care (43)(44)(45)(46), our vignettes do not represent all possible scenarios in CKD; however, we followed steps to ensure adequate content validity of our vignettes, including using guidelines to identify key relevant clinical factors, reviewing by clinical nephrologists, and pilot testing for comprehensibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional limitation is that survey responses may not reflect actual decision-making in clinical practice. Although survey-based clinical vignettes are widely recognized to be a valid, reliable, practical, and cost-effective technique to assess process of care (43)(44)(45)(46), our vignettes do not represent all possible scenarios in CKD; however, we followed steps to ensure adequate content validity of our vignettes, including using guidelines to identify key relevant clinical factors, reviewing by clinical nephrologists, and pilot testing for comprehensibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the medical record itself may have a substantial number of errors. (30)(31)(32) Because we use the medical record as the "gold standard" to which we compare self-report, it is possible that this assessment also has error. For some of the diseases the sample size of the inaccurate reporters was small which may have contributed to the lack of associations due to a lack of power to measure a difference between the inaccurate and accurate self-reporters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low rates of some diabetes care activities in study practices may have been a function of incomplete (and then improved) documentation rather than inadequate (and then improved) delivery of care (39). However, for purposes of accountability, improved documentation is equivalent to improved care delivery.…”
Section: Effects Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%