2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How wide a urethra should we produce?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the native, proximal urethra in an individual patient should serve as the reference size in hypospadias repair, as reported earlier [3], we believe that the agedependent chart of urethral growth that we present may additionally facilitate surgical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the native, proximal urethra in an individual patient should serve as the reference size in hypospadias repair, as reported earlier [3], we believe that the agedependent chart of urethral growth that we present may additionally facilitate surgical practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the age group of 2e4 years, a difference of 0.7 mm in diameter results in a 2-fold calculated difference in urine flow. As previously reported, in most patients, the external meatus is considerably narrower than the normal native urethra, proximal to the bifurcation of the corpus spongiosum [3]. Thus by repairing the neourethra to a size equal to the external meatus, the urine flow may be considerably reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation