2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How willing are different types of landowner to supply hardwood timber residues for bioenergy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most academic studies of the economic availability of logging residues focus on NIPF landowners. Although appreciation of natural amenities affects the willingness of NIPF owners to harvest timber, several studies report widespread willingness to harvest residues once owners have decided to harvest mixed forests across the northern tier of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Massachusetts (Markowski‐Lindsay et al 2012; Aguilar, Cai, and D'Amato 2014a; Dulys‐Nusbaum, Klammer, and Swinton 2019) and in Missouri (Aguilar, Daniel, and Cai 2014b). Many NIPF owners are reluctant to allow logging residues to be removed from their properties, even when offered market‐rate biomass payments.…”
Section: How Biomass Residue Reaches Energy Users: a Tale Of Two Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most academic studies of the economic availability of logging residues focus on NIPF landowners. Although appreciation of natural amenities affects the willingness of NIPF owners to harvest timber, several studies report widespread willingness to harvest residues once owners have decided to harvest mixed forests across the northern tier of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Massachusetts (Markowski‐Lindsay et al 2012; Aguilar, Cai, and D'Amato 2014a; Dulys‐Nusbaum, Klammer, and Swinton 2019) and in Missouri (Aguilar, Daniel, and Cai 2014b). Many NIPF owners are reluctant to allow logging residues to be removed from their properties, even when offered market‐rate biomass payments.…”
Section: How Biomass Residue Reaches Energy Users: a Tale Of Two Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why? The economic supply of residues is limited by factors beyond conventional production costs—notably by limited landowner willingness to sell residues (GC and Mehmood 2012; Markowski‐Lindsay et al 2012; Aguilar, Cai, and D'Amato 2014a; Dulys‐Nusbaum, Klammer, and Swinton 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os resíduos da colheita podem ser usados para energia como subprodutos em forma fresca (cavacos) ou densificada (briquetes e pellets), alternativas de utilização que podem adicionar renda às ao manejo florestal. Isto é especialmente aplicado quando se considera o baixo valor dos resíduos e a transformação destes em briquetes ou pellets que são biocombustíveis potencialmente competitivo e com valor agregado (Dulys-Nusbaum et al, 2019).…”
unclassified
“…These agents may manage multiple parcels of land, which is consistent with ownership patterns. Harvest decision making was based literature data for forest owners in the WUP and similar regions (see [71,91,189,190] [189]. Loggers are presumed to be willing to collect and sell the woody biomass if the payment exceeds their costs by a given margin.…”
Section: Feedstock Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66,221,222]. As these equations are in bone dry tons, green tons are approximated by doubling the weight which is consistent with biomass bids [189].…”
Section: A71 Forest Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%