2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-394393-4.00006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Working Memory Capacity Affects Problem Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
3
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Young adults completed two mathematical performance measures, three tests of basic number skills, two small-scale spatial tasks, and control measures of verbal, visual-spatial, and executive working memory. Working memory is strongly related to math performance among adults (Ashcraft & Kirk, 2001;DeStefano & LeFevre, 2004;Raghubar, Barnes, & Hecht, 2010;Wiley & Jarosz, 2012) and was controlled to ensure that any relations between fundamental number skills and math anxiety were independent of working memory abilities. Math anxiety was assessed using the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (i.e., AMAS; Hopko, Mahadevan, Bare, & Hunt, 2003) which has been used extensively in other studies with adults (e.g., Ferguson et al, 2015;Maloney et al, 2011Maloney et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Hypothesis 2: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young adults completed two mathematical performance measures, three tests of basic number skills, two small-scale spatial tasks, and control measures of verbal, visual-spatial, and executive working memory. Working memory is strongly related to math performance among adults (Ashcraft & Kirk, 2001;DeStefano & LeFevre, 2004;Raghubar, Barnes, & Hecht, 2010;Wiley & Jarosz, 2012) and was controlled to ensure that any relations between fundamental number skills and math anxiety were independent of working memory abilities. Math anxiety was assessed using the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (i.e., AMAS; Hopko, Mahadevan, Bare, & Hunt, 2003) which has been used extensively in other studies with adults (e.g., Ferguson et al, 2015;Maloney et al, 2011Maloney et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Hypothesis 2: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although generally useful for solving non-insight problems, such focused attention may lead individuals to overlook more distantly-related information held outside the perceived problem space (Wiley & Jarosz, 2012a). Second, attentional control supports one's ability to execute complex problem-solving approaches (Hambrick & Engle, 2003;Wiley & Jarosz, 2012b). However, if individuals persist in using such approaches, then they may be slower to recognize that their initial representation of the problem has created an impasse that can only be overcome by developing a new representation of the problem (Schooler, Fallshore, & Fiore, 1995).…”
Section: Executive Attention and Insightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity and scope are likely interdependent, just as increasing the span of a light beam reduces the intensity of the light. Narrow and highly selective attention may be an advantage in some situations, such as when one is required to fixate on relevant information when solving a complex arithmetic problem (Wiley & Jarosz, 2012) or during rule-based learning (DeCaro, Thomas, & Beilock, 2008). Broadening the spatial scope of attention may spread attentional resources required for selectivity more diffusely, possibly reducing the selective power in a given area (Eriksen & St. James, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadening the spatial scope of attention may spread attentional resources required for selectivity more diffusely, possibly reducing the selective power in a given area (Eriksen & St. James, 1986). There are situations, however, in which broad or diffuse attention, paired with less selectivity, is more advantageous, for instance in some forms of search (Smilek, Enns, Eastwood, & Merikle, 2006), information-integration learning (DeCaro et al, 2008), ensemble processing (Alvarez & Oliva, 2009), and creative problem solving (Wiley & Jarosz, 2012). The delicate balance between diffusely distributed and selective attention may be differentially tipped by the fluid nature of task characteristics, mood, or emotion (Schmitz, De Rosa, & Anderson, 2009) or by stable personality traits: some individuals may show a stronger propensity to engage one attentional mode over another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%