“…On the basis of these questionable age data, Azor et al [2008, paragraphs 22 and 23] claim that “the BAA unit cannot represent an oceanic realm related to the Rheic Ocean,” that “the Rheic suture is not represented at all in the BAA unit,” and that there are “some doubts on the tectonic meaning of the OMZ/SPZ boundary.” These assertions are not justified for two reasons: first, as discussed in section 2, their data were most likely not obtained on oceanic rocks, but rather on postcollisional intrusives, and therefore are not directly relevant to the problem of the putative Rheic Ocean in that region; second, the interpretation of the broad OMZ/SPZ boundary zone in terms of an oceanic suture is well documented by the typical NMORBs occurring as tectonic slices south of Aracena [e.g., Castro et al , 1996; Pin et al , 2008], and as blocks in the Peramora Melange of the Pulo do Lobo unit [ Eden , 1991; Eden and Andrews , 1990]. Further, the occurrence of HP/LT metamorphism in the southern part of the Ossa‐Morena Zone in Portugal provides circumstantial evidence for an oceanic suture in this area [e.g., De Jong et al , 1991; Fonseca et al , 1999; Booth‐Rea et al , 2006]. The Middle to Late Devonian age of the Peramora Melange [ Eden and Andrews , 1990] and the Late Devonian radiometric ages measured for the HP/LT metamorphism [ Moita et al , 2005] imply that the intervening oceanic lithosphere between the OMZ and SPZ was at least Mid‐Devonian in age.…”