2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/9092565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPV-Chlamydial Coinfection, Prevalence, and Association with Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions: A Pilot Study at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

Abstract: Background Human Pappilloma Virus (HPV) is the necessary cause of cervical cancer. A number of risk factors are believed to influence the role of HPV in the development of cervical cancer. This is so because majority of HPV infections are cleared and only a few are able to result into cancer. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is considered a potential cofactor in the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), although different studies have produced contradicting information (Silins et al., 2005, Bellam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In women with abnormal cytology we detected 18% HPV DNA positive, surprisingly prevalence lower than women with normal cytology but in agreement with Ji, who detected 18.4% HPV in women with abnormal cytology, who visited the department of gynecology of the hospital from China [ 5 ]. To difference with our results, Beyazit detected 51% of genital HPV in women with intact uterus with distinct gynecologic complaints [ 18 ], Ssedyabane 63.4% in patients that presented at the cervical cancer clinic [ 27 ] and a local study conducted by Venezuela detected 51.6% in women with abnormal cytology with antecedents of squamous intraepithelial lesions who attended private clinics and public health centers in Córdoba, Argentina [ 28 ]. When the patient had HPV positive test and normal cytology, a gynecological follow up is important to verify if HPV then is negative or if the cytology lesions has appeared [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…In women with abnormal cytology we detected 18% HPV DNA positive, surprisingly prevalence lower than women with normal cytology but in agreement with Ji, who detected 18.4% HPV in women with abnormal cytology, who visited the department of gynecology of the hospital from China [ 5 ]. To difference with our results, Beyazit detected 51% of genital HPV in women with intact uterus with distinct gynecologic complaints [ 18 ], Ssedyabane 63.4% in patients that presented at the cervical cancer clinic [ 27 ] and a local study conducted by Venezuela detected 51.6% in women with abnormal cytology with antecedents of squamous intraepithelial lesions who attended private clinics and public health centers in Córdoba, Argentina [ 28 ]. When the patient had HPV positive test and normal cytology, a gynecological follow up is important to verify if HPV then is negative or if the cytology lesions has appeared [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…In women with abnormal cytology we detected 18% HPV DNA positive, surprisingly prevalence lower than women with normal cytology but in agreement with Ji, who detected 18.4% HPV in abnormal cytology [5]. To difference with our results, Beyazit detected 51% of genital HPV [14], Ssedyabane 63.4% [25] and a local study conducted by Venezuela detected 51.6% in women with abnormal cytology [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Cofactors like immune status, hormones, and coinfections are emerging as a causal link in cervical cancer development (Koskela, Anttila et al 2000, Brake and Lambert 2005, Zhu, Shen et al 2016. Coinfections with C. trachomatis are seen at an increased incidence in patients with invasive cervical and ovarian cancers (Koskela, Anttila et al 2000, Ssedyabane, Amnia et al 2019), yet the coinfection dynamics and the underlying mechanisms are entirely unknown. Unlike tumor viruses whose DNA can be found within the tumors, bacteria linked to cancers rarely leave any traceable elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%