2015
DOI: 10.21086/ksles.2015.02.22.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Vaccination Coverage and Intention among Female Middle and High School Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Korean National Immunization Survey, vaccination coverage in 2013 was 28.7%, 15.9%, and 4.6% among women aged 19-26 years, 27-39 years, and 40-59 years, respectively [ 2 ]. Although there is no national data on vaccine coverage in young girls, several studies have demonstrated low rates among high school girls (1%-10%) [ 3 - 6 ]. Given that HPV is a cause of cervical cancer, and a safe and effective vaccine is available, the most effective target population is young girls without any sexual experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the Korean National Immunization Survey, vaccination coverage in 2013 was 28.7%, 15.9%, and 4.6% among women aged 19-26 years, 27-39 years, and 40-59 years, respectively [ 2 ]. Although there is no national data on vaccine coverage in young girls, several studies have demonstrated low rates among high school girls (1%-10%) [ 3 - 6 ]. Given that HPV is a cause of cervical cancer, and a safe and effective vaccine is available, the most effective target population is young girls without any sexual experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there had been no national or governmental HPV vaccination program, such as organized school-based vaccination or subsidized vaccination programs, until 2016. Thus, the vaccine coverage during this period was low (12% among adult women [ 2 ]; 1%-10% among high school girls [ 3 - 6 ]). Moreover, awareness regarding HPV vaccination and its effectiveness, which is an important factor that influences the voluntary reception of the vaccination, was low among adult men and women [ 7 ], mothers [ 5 , 8 ], high-school girls [ 3 , 4 ], and college students [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the time, South Korean females feel embarrassed or humiliated when they have to reveal their genitalia in front of a male physician at the obstetrics/gynecology (OBGYN) clinic, and these kinds of negative emotions interfere with regular gynecological checkups (Lee, 2015; Park et al., 2005, 2006). According to a study of 452 female middle and high school students in Seoul (Choi and Cheon, 2015), the proportion of female middle and high school students who had visited OBGYN clinics was 15.0%, which was lower than that of female college students (26.7%) (Kim and Ahn, 2007). Some of the main reasons that they avoid visiting the OBGYN clinic are that they have no signs or symptoms that are related to gynecological problems, are unmarried, or are afraid of what others may think about the visit to the clinic (Kim and Ahn, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there are no guidelines for adolescents, when adolescents are experiencing abnormal gynecologic signs and symptoms, such as dysmenorrhea or abnormal uterine bleeding, they must get a proper screening at the gynecological clinic (Braverman and Breech, 2010). The more awareness and knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer, the higher the HPV vaccination status and intent of female teenagers (Choi and Cheon, 2015). Therefore, if knowledge about the Pap test were to increase, then the intention to perform and the actual performance rate will increase (Kim, 2009; Kim et al., 2015; Marek et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No article was excluded after quality evaluation according to MMAT guidelines, because it might have caused bias [ 22 ]. Two papers were scored as low [ 23 , 24 ], four papers as moderate [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], and thirteen as very high [ 10 , 12 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Two papers with low scores were retained because despite having participants from limited areas, they investigated important ideas related to this systematic review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%