HPV testing: a mixed-method approach to understand why women prefer self-collection in a middle-income country

Abstract

BackgroundHPV test self-collection has been shown to reduce barriers to cervical screening and increase uptake. However, little is known about women’s preferences when given the choice between self-collected and clinician-collected tests. This paper aims to describe experiences with HPV self-collection among women in Jujuy, the first Argentinean province to have introduced HPV testing as the primary screening method, provided free of cost in all public health centers.MethodsBetween July and December 2012, data on acceptability of HPV self-collection and several social variables including past screening were collected from 2616 self-collection accepters and 433 non-accepters, and were analyzed using multivariate regression. In addition, in-depth interviews (n = 30) and 2 focus groups were carried out and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsQuantitative findings indicate that main reasons for choosing self-collection are those reducing barriers related to women’s roles of responsibility for domestic work and work/family organization, and to health care services’ organization. No social variables were significantly associated with acceptability. Among those who preferred clinician-collection, the main reasons were trust in health professionals and fear of hurting themselves. Qualitative findings also showed that self-collection allows women to overcome barriers related to the health system (i.e. long wait times), without sacrificing time devoted to work/domestic responsibilities.ConclusionsFindings have implications for self-collection recommendations, as they show it is the preferred method when women are given the choice, even if they are not screening non-attenders. Findings also highlight the importance of incorporating women’s needs/preferences in HPV screening recommendations.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3474-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of patient flow and provider efficiency of two delivery strategies for HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Western Kenya: a time and motion study

“…Women in other contexts have reported that self-testing helped overcome long wait times at the clinic and thus reduced the amount of time spent away from work [34]. More recently, self-testing for HPV has become more common in low and middle-income countries, and governments are in the process of considering expanded programs and different delivery models for HPV-screening.…”

El impacto de la prueba de VPH en los programas de tamizaje en América Latina: el caso de Argentina

“…La información para la evaluación del nivel de impacto provino de las presentaciones sobre el PDJ que se realizaron en los eventos nacionales e internacionales en los que participó el PNPCC, del análisis de las publicaciones del PDJ en revistas nacionales e internacionales, 15,16,42,43 y la observación derivada de la participación de la autora en la definición de la política pública y su implementación.…”

Nuevas estrategias de prevención y control de cáncer de cuello uterino en Chile

“…La baja cobertura de tamizaje se debe a problemas de acceso al sistema de salud, agravado por el rechazo al examen ginecológico. 18 El examen de VPH permite que la mujer obtenga su propia muestra mediante la autotoma vaginal. Entre 2010 y 2013 se seleccionó a las mujeres mayores de 30 años inasistentes a su control de Pap (>3 años sin control) de la comuna de Puente Alto en Santiago y se les invitó a asistir a su centro de salud, donde serían atendidas sin demora.…”

“…Los análisis serológicos para la detección de anticuerpos contra la proteína L1 de los VPHAR 16,18,31, 33, 35, 45, 52 y 58 se realizaron en la Universidad de Heidelberg mediante serología multiplex. La seropositividad para los ocho tipos de VPH AR estudiados subió de 43.2 a 50.2% entre 2001 y 2006.…”