1987
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRAS1-selected chromosome transfer generates markers that colocalize aniridia- and genitourinary dysplasia-associated translocation breakpoints and the Wilms tumor gene within band 11p13.

Abstract: We show that chromosome-mediated gene transfer can provide an enriched source of DNA markers for predetermined, subchromosomal regions of the human genome. Forty-four human DNA recombinants isolated from a HRASI-selected chromosome-mediated gene transformant map exclusively to chromosome 11, with several sublocalizing to the Wilms tumor region at llpl3. We present a detailed molecular map of the deletion chromosomes 11 from five WAGR (Wilms tumor/aniridia/genitourinary abnormalities/ mental retardation) syndro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient SOA is therefore one of the very few cases of WAGR syndrome reported without a deletion of the segment carrying the gene for CAT (van Heyningen et al. 1985;Glaser et al, 1986;Brunsetal., 1987 Cytogenetic analyses and DNA studies of such patients with WAGR syndrome and different partial deletions of band 11 p 13 allow further dissection of the responsible chromosome region into several subregions (van Heyningen et al, 1985;Glaser et al, 1986;B runsetaL 1987;Cowell and Little, 1987;Davis et al, 1987;Huerre-Jeanpierre et al, 1987;Porteous et al, 1987;Bickmore et al, 1988;Lewis et al, 1988). A molecular analysis of these patients with new markers will provide a better physical map for this chro mosomal region.…”
Section: Lev2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient SOA is therefore one of the very few cases of WAGR syndrome reported without a deletion of the segment carrying the gene for CAT (van Heyningen et al. 1985;Glaser et al, 1986;Brunsetal., 1987 Cytogenetic analyses and DNA studies of such patients with WAGR syndrome and different partial deletions of band 11 p 13 allow further dissection of the responsible chromosome region into several subregions (van Heyningen et al, 1985;Glaser et al, 1986;B runsetaL 1987;Cowell and Little, 1987;Davis et al, 1987;Huerre-Jeanpierre et al, 1987;Porteous et al, 1987;Bickmore et al, 1988;Lewis et al, 1988). A molecular analysis of these patients with new markers will provide a better physical map for this chro mosomal region.…”
Section: Lev2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that most of these WAGR and AGR children are born with a hemizygous interstitial deletion of 11p13 (6,7) has led to the speculation that chromosome band 11p13 houses not only the aniridia gene and a gene predisposing to Wilms tumor but also an unknown number of additional genes necessary for normal development of the kidney, iris, genitourinary tract, and mental function. In fact, a discrete, apparently autosomal dominant locus in 11p13 that may be responsible for complete renal agenesis has been described (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some, the source of clones was a Livermore Laboratory chromosome 11 library (12-15); others generated reduced chromosome human-rodent somatic cell hybrids (8,16,17), from which genomic libraries were constructed and human clones were identified by hybridization to human repetitive sequence probes. Both of these probe isolation strategies require that the markers be mapped to the region of interest on a panel of somatic cell hybrids retaining deletions or translocations in the region of interest and share the disadvantage of only recovering probes at the same percentage as the region of interest is to the total starting material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N Y X 3 .1. is a m ouse m yelom a x hu m an lym phoblastoid hybrid from a W A G R patient. C ytogenetic analysis dem o n strated a deletion extending from 11 p i 3 to 11 p i 5.4 (Porteous et al, 1987). T he proxim al breakpoint o f the deletion lies distal to p2G8 (D l 1S50) (P orteous e ta l.. 1987), whereas LDH A m aps beyond the distal break point (Scrable et al, 1990), which unam biguously m aps to 1 l p l 5.1->p!4 (Ju nien and van H eyningen, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%