2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3546495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRM and Employee Performance for an Ageing Workforce: A Qualitative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, in the current study, we have not examined potential age differences that can be attributed to the accessibility of employees to HPWS opportunities, while the latter could explain part of the variance in our findings. Previous qualitative research findings already indicated that organizations avoid adopting differentiated practices for different age groups, as this could be considered as a sign of preferential treatment and/or discrimination (Pahos & Galanaki, 2020). In additional analyses using our data we explored this issue, and we tested for a possible difference in the perception of HPWS across the younger and the older age groups and found no significant differences between the two groups (t = .597, p = .551, df = 340).…”
Section: M Itations a Nd Fu T Ur E R E S E A Rchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in the current study, we have not examined potential age differences that can be attributed to the accessibility of employees to HPWS opportunities, while the latter could explain part of the variance in our findings. Previous qualitative research findings already indicated that organizations avoid adopting differentiated practices for different age groups, as this could be considered as a sign of preferential treatment and/or discrimination (Pahos & Galanaki, 2020). In additional analyses using our data we explored this issue, and we tested for a possible difference in the perception of HPWS across the younger and the older age groups and found no significant differences between the two groups (t = .597, p = .551, df = 340).…”
Section: M Itations a Nd Fu T Ur E R E S E A Rchmentioning
confidence: 99%