HTLV‐positive and ‐negative T‐cell lymphomas. Morphological and immunohistochemical differences between european and HTLV‐positive japanese T‐cell lymphomas

Abstract

A total of 56 cases of malignant lymphoma presumed to be of peripheral T-cell origin were investigated with regard to histological and immunohistochemical features. The goal of the study was to determine whether virus-associated T-cell lymphomas can be morphologically or immunohistochemically distinguished from presumably virus-negative T-cell lymphomas. The cases came from endemic and non-endemic regions of Japan, the United Kingdom (including 4 Caribbean cases) and the Federal Republic of Germany. Sera of all Japanese and Caribbean patients and 8 German patients were tested for antibodies to adult T-cell leukaemia virus-associated antigen HTLV-A. In all cases sections were examined blind by 5 well-trained histopathologists. In most cases cryostat sections could be prepared from fresh tissue specimens and stained with a large panel of monoclonal antibodies. All HTLV-A-positive cases were morphologically classifiable as the pleomorphic type of T-cell lymphoma. Approximately 70% of the tested cases of pleomorphic T-cell lymphoma, however, showed a positive serum reaction for HTLV-A. All other types of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (T-immunoblastic lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia of T type, T-zone lymphoma, "AILD type" and lymphoepithelioid cell lymphoma) were HTLV-A-negative and mostly observed in European patients. Thus virus-associated T-cell lymphomas appear to be invariably of the pleomorphic type; but pleomorphism is not specific to HTLV-A-positive cases. This was also evident from the results of an experiment in which 2 Japanese histopathologists attempted to recognize HTLV-A positivity in a blind study of pleomorphic T-cell lymphomas. A maximum of about 80% of cases were correctly identified, with about 10% false-positive diagnoses (in HTLV-A-negative or presumably negative cases) and 10% false-negative diagnoses. The immunohistochemical analysis revealed not only many common features but also 2 distinct differences between HTLV-A-positive and -negative T-cell lymphomas. All but one of the HTLV-A-positive cases showed reactivity with anti-Tac and all cases in the virus-positive group were negative for TU14. All other cases were Tac-negative and approximately 65% of these cases exhibited reactivity with TU14. Preliminary cytogenetic observations suggest that there are also differences in specific chromosome aberrations.

Can peripheral T‐Cell lymphomas be morphologically subclassified? A morphometric approach to 21 cases

“…All methods were previously described (3,20,21). Cases 1,7,8,[17][18][19][20] were T4+T8-, cases 3 , 5 , and 12 were T4-T8+, cases 10,13, 15, and 17 were T4+T8 + , and cases 4 and 11 were T4 -T8 -. Twelve of…”

How I treat adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma

“…The histologic features of lymph nodes in ATL may be indistinguishable from those of other peripheral T-cell lymphomas. 54,55 At least 5% of circulating abnormal T lymphocytes is required to diagnose ATL in patients without histologically proven tumor lesions. 44 These tumor cells, also termed "flower cells" or "clover leaf" and considered pathognomonic of ATL, may display 5 common morphologic subtypes:…”

Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans

“…However, there is no unique histological pattern of Iymphoid involvement in A TLL, which may be very simiIar to that of other peripheral T-cell lymphomas. The lymph nodes show effacement of the normal architecture by lymphoid cells of different size, varying from small to large (mixed-cell pattern) (Lennert et al, 1985). Cases with unusual histoIogy or even with a c1inical picture resembling that of Hodgkin's disease have been described (Duggan et aL., 1988;Ohshima et al, 1991a;Picard et al, 1990).…”