https://www.actascientific.com/ASNH/pdf/ASNH-06-1093.pdf

Simões, Greice Dotto; Amaral, Cainá Corrêa do; Ferrúa, Camila Perelló; Aldrighi, Amanda de Lima; Souza, Karoline Brizola de; Corrêa, Geovanna Peter; Giorgi, Roberta; Nedel, Fernanda

doi:10.31080/asnh.2022.06.1093

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Motivations and aims which may be distinguished are fun/entertainment, and performance improvement, 4 hedonic, utilitarian, and eudaemonic, 42 self-association, -design, -discipline, and -healing, 47 expertization 5 and empowerment. 52 As more uncommon motivations or aims, some athletes use fitness apps as a means to pursue their ‘biographical project’ and (self-)identify as a (professional) athlete, 46 , 53 or to reach ‘digital immortality’.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

User types, psycho-social effects and societal trends related to the use of consumer health technologies

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The term consumer health technologies we use in this paper refers to fitness and health apps, wearables and other self-tracking devices that collect health-related data. Our paper aims to bridge the gap between the growing literature base of sociological research and ethical reflection on the (non-intended) effects of consumer health technology use on the psycho-social level, such as stress, responsibilization or a loss of intuitive sense for signs of health or illness. Special consideration should be given to vulnerable individuals, as the positive and negative effects of consumer health technology use may be unequally distributed. This perspective may help to guide policymaking and the responsible development of consumer health technologies. Methods Using a narrative review approach, we refer to empirical and theoretical studies dealing with user types and effects related to the use of consumer health technologies. We provide an overview of consumer health technology user typologies and evidence of the unintended psycho-social effects of consumer health technology use. On this basis, we propose a user typology that may serve as a future tool for ethical reflection on negative side effects. Results Evidence of the potential negative side effects of consumer health technology use, as presented in the literature, is inconclusive due to the high diversity of consumer health technology users and the way they use consumer health technologies. Our proposed user typology aims to more comprehensively document the diversity of users by incorporating the way in which users identify with and use their self-tracked data, attitudes towards the new technology and social interactions via consumer health technologies, and the purpose and self-determinedness of consumer health technology use. Conclusions More systematic and quantitative empirical research on the effects of consumer health technology use in diverse settings and with diverse user types is necessary to inform public health policy. In addition to evidence-based certification of medical consumer health technologies, more practical and flexible ways to protect users from side effects may have to be developed and adopted, especially regarding the increasing number of non-medical consumer health technologies.

show abstract