2023
DOI: 10.3390/universe9020094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics

Abstract: The ΛCDM model provides a good fit to most astronomical observations but harbors large areas of phenomenology and ignorance. With the improvements in the precision and number of observations, discrepancies between key cosmological parameters of this model have emerged. Among them, the most notable tension is the 4σ to 6σ deviation between the Hubble constant (H0) estimations measured by the local distance ladder and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement. In this review, we revisit the H0 tension ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 471 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent comparisons of the direct local determinations of H 0 (late Universe), and the values predicted using cosmological model calibrated observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB; early Universe), show a persistent ∼9% difference, which has become known as the Hubble tension. The most precise local measurement (SH0ES, Riess et al 2022) disagrees with the most precise value inferred from the early Universe (Planck Collaboration et al 2020) by >5σ, which may be an intriguing indication of new physics (see reviews by Di Valentino et al 2021;Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2022;Kamionkowski & Riess 2023;Hu & Wang 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Recent comparisons of the direct local determinations of H 0 (late Universe), and the values predicted using cosmological model calibrated observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB; early Universe), show a persistent ∼9% difference, which has become known as the Hubble tension. The most precise local measurement (SH0ES, Riess et al 2022) disagrees with the most precise value inferred from the early Universe (Planck Collaboration et al 2020) by >5σ, which may be an intriguing indication of new physics (see reviews by Di Valentino et al 2021;Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2022;Kamionkowski & Riess 2023;Hu & Wang 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These results seemingly worsen the recently established tension between the inferred value of H 0 from early and late times Universe probes, which has been argued to potentially be the sign of new cosmological physics (see for example refs. [78][79][80][81][82][83]). This might appear to be in contradiction with the possibility, explored for example in refs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating additional data: Hubble's law is based on observations of relatively nearby galaxies, but there is a wealth of data available from more distant objects, such as supernovae or cosmic microwave background radiation. By incorporating these additional data sets into their analyses, scientists could refine the predictions of Hubble's law and better understand the evolution of the universe (Hu, 2023).…”
Section: General Relativistic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%