2015
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1102340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hugs and behaviour points: Alternative education and the regulation of ‘excluded’ youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the author’s experience of working in an AEP for 11‐17 year olds for over eleven years, and consistent within the limited research literature available (see, for example, Thomson and Pennacchia, ), reintegration into mainstream, or indeed a special school, is highly unlikely. For instance, the seven participants discussed in this current study were referred to the AEP because of expulsion or for non‐attendance and none have ‐ or will ‐ return to mainstream education.…”
Section: Education Other Than At School (Eotas)mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…From the author’s experience of working in an AEP for 11‐17 year olds for over eleven years, and consistent within the limited research literature available (see, for example, Thomson and Pennacchia, ), reintegration into mainstream, or indeed a special school, is highly unlikely. For instance, the seven participants discussed in this current study were referred to the AEP because of expulsion or for non‐attendance and none have ‐ or will ‐ return to mainstream education.…”
Section: Education Other Than At School (Eotas)mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…While staff within PRUs have traditionally drawn on practices associated with social pedagogy, an ethic of care and a strong moral imperative to carry out their work, research has suggested that this has begun to change, particularly within the English education system (Thomson and Pennacchia, 2016). This work has illustrated how this informal, socially driven or therapeutic form of schooling has been challenged by recent policy changes which have exposed PRUs to more external accountability measures, reframing how they are run and changing the practices within them (Thomson and Pennacchia, 2016). For instance, in Thomson and Pennacchia's study (2016), processes for proving effectiveness of the profession were in place, where 'progress had to be visible and measured'.…”
Section: Pupil Referral Unit Practice: a Form Of Social Pedagogy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the teacher in charge recognised the need for care and support, there was also the necessity for improved educational outcomes. These external pressures were clearly more apparent to the head teacher, who articulated a shift in focus at the PRU like practices elsewhere (Thomson and Pennacchia, 2016). The head outlined a more traditional form of schooling that they were now aiming for, with an emphasis on learning and academic performance: … I think the big change has been … creating a team of staff who see themselves as a team … and we've had to accelerate that because of external pressures to improve, from Estyn and organisations like that … But bringing the focus on … teaching and learning has been the other really big change.…”
Section: External Accountabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we have reported in detail elsewhere (Thomson & Pennacchia, 2015), AE disciplinary approaches are now strongly framed by the need to 'show' what is happening to, with and for students. This has lead to student attendance and conduct being monitored, graded and graphed across lessons, days, weeks and terms.…”
Section: The Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%