2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hum-mPLoc 3.0: prediction enhancement of human protein subcellular localization through modeling the hidden correlations of gene ontology and functional domain features

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subcellular localization of the identified proteins in this paper was analyzed according to the dataset from the Hum-mPLoc 3.0 [29][30][31]. Protein copy number per cell (pc/c) of the identified proteins was searched from a previous report by Wisniewski et al [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subcellular localization of the identified proteins in this paper was analyzed according to the dataset from the Hum-mPLoc 3.0 [29][30][31]. Protein copy number per cell (pc/c) of the identified proteins was searched from a previous report by Wisniewski et al [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further demonstrate the performance of our method, we compare our BCMRFs with the only available PPI-based approach for predicting human protein SCLs, DC-kNN [17] and the state-of-art protein feature-based method Hum-mPLoc 3.0 [26]. DC-kNN is a physical PPI-based prediction method using a k-nearest neighbors classi cation with binary reference approach.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hum-mPLoc 3.0 [26] is the state-of-the-art feature-based SCL predictor speci cally for human proteins. It predicts SCLs based on the amino acid sequence of proteins through modeling the hidden Table 4 demonstrate that our method achieves better performance.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations